How can teachers make a difference in climate change education?

How can teachers make a difference in climate change education?

by | NW 30 Environmental and Sustainability Education Research, ESER

Student: Teacher, I want to play with snowballs, but it’s not snowing. My Mom said that it used to snow a lot at this time of year.

Teacher: Your Mom is right. It’s December! We’re used to snow in winter, but we haven’t had any this year.

Student: Why isn’t it snowing now? What’s happening to the seasons?

Teacher: What you’re noticing is climate change. We need to explore it to protect our planet.

The above dialogue illustrates that climate change is no longer a distant concern; it has become a reality we experience firsthand. From unseasonably warm days to extreme weather events, we are becoming more aware of the changes happening around us. Research has confirmed that long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns are occurring. The United Nations (2023) reports that the Earth’s average surface temperature is now about 1.2°C warmer than it was before the industrial revolution. It is now well recognized that human activities that increase greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere contribute to climate change  (World Meteorological Organization, 2024). The human impact on climate change highlights the importance of education as a strategic tool for promoting environmentally responsible behaviors to help mitigate its effects.

 Teachers undoubtedly play a key role in climate change education. While many teachers may think that only science or geography educators can tackle climate change, research reveals that it’s a cross-disciplinary topic that can be woven into every subject (Tibola da Rocha et al., 2020). But how can teachers effectively respond to climate change and create a meaningful impact? In this blog post, we outline the key principles of effective climate change education.

The importance of teacher education programs

Illustrated infographic titled “How can teachers make a difference in climate change education?” with a central question surrounded by ten action points. These include: Develop a green curriculum Focus on mitigation and adaptation Address emotions, values, knowledge, thinking, and skills Tackle misconceptions Invest in teacher education and professional development Empower student action Integrate across subjects Use technology Engage all stakeholders Use active, experiential, reflective learning The design features icons representing each point and is decorated with plants, trees, and a sun to evoke nature and sustainability.

To address climate change effectively, teachers need to embrace evidence-based strategies that target two crucial areas: mitigation and adaptation (Anderson, 2012). To effectively guide students in these areas, however, teachers themselves must first be strongly aware of climate change – the causes, the impacts, and the strategies for both mitigation and adaptation. Given that many teachers struggle with inadequate preparation in both knowledge and practical approaches for engaging their students in addressing the climate crisis (Beach, 2023), teacher education programs and professional development initiatives become essential in bridging this gap. These programs can serve as powerful catalysts, providing educators with the insights, strategies, and confidence they need to tackle climate change. learning.

Greening the curriculum

While teacher education is crucial, so is the effort to green the curriculum. A well-designed curriculum empowers teachers and strengthens their impact on students. According to UNESCO (2024), effective climate change education requires a green curriculum that covers diverse aspects of climate change, integrates relevant local knowledge, and emphasizes learner-centered, experiential, and reflective learning approaches. Equally important is how teachers bring the curriculum to life in the classroom. Teachers who are effectively prepared for climate change education go beyond simply delivering facts; they help students understand climate challenges deeply, reflect on their consequences, and explore ways to contribute to solutions (Stevenson, Nicholls, & Whitehouse, 2017).

Using the bicycle metaphor as a framework to address climate change education

Bicycle model on climate change education: presenting and evaluating a model (Cantell, et al)

 

The bicycle metaphor of Cantell et al. (2020) provides a valuable framework for teachers in shaping their approach to climate change education.

Wheels: the foundational knowledge and thinking skills necessary to address climate issues.

Pedals:  highlight the action-oriented aspect of climate change education, where knowledge is transformed into meaningful change.

Lamp: underscores the importance of emotions and hope for climate change education, reminding teachers to nurture emotional awareness and resilience in their students.

Frame: symbolizes the core values that shape how students understand and engage with climate challenges.

This holistic approach encourages teachers to integrate knowledge, action, emotions, and values into their lessons.

As Bentz (2020) emphasized, it is vital that teachers discover effective ways to engage young people with a topic that often feels abstract, distant, and overwhelmingly complex, while also addressing the feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and anxiety it can evoke. Rousell and Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles (2020) indicated that didactic approaches to climate change education have proven largely ineffective in influencing students’ attitudes and behaviors. Thus, shifting away from traditional lecture-based teaching toward more interactive and creative methods is essential for meaningful climate change education in schools. Research by Monroe and colleagues (2019) offers valuable insights into strategies that can make climate change education truly impactful. At the heart of these strategies is promoting student reflection and active engagement to understand the causes and consequences of climate change, while also empowering them to explore adaptation and mitigation strategies, and take necessary actions.

4 actionable approaches teachers can use to address climate change education

  1. Foster meaningful discussions: Create opportunities for students to discuss climate-related issues openly, share their perspectives, and learn from one another.
  2. Connect students with scientists: Invite experts into your classroom to help students learn about climate science firsthand and encourage them to ask questions to deepen their understanding.
  3. Tackle misconceptions: Address common misunderstandings about climate change and guide students toward evidence-based knowledge.
  4. Support project-based learning: Encourage students to work on projects that connect classroom learning to real-world issues, whether through school initiatives or community-based efforts.

As part of these approaches, teachers can take advantage of integrating technology into learning. Research shows that technology-enhanced games and simulations can significantly impact awareness about climate change (Creutzig & Kapmeier, 2020). For instance, NASA (2025) has created a website called ClimateKids, which includes games, activities, and videos, making it a valuable resource for teachers.

The importance of collective climate action with and beyond the school community

Finally, it is important to highlight that while teachers’ approach to climate change education matters, their impact can be significantly amplified when other stakeholders such as principals, school staff at all levels, families, and community members are actively involved in the process. This whole-institution approach reinforces the idea of collective climate action and fosters a unified effort toward meaningful change (Hargis et al., 2021). Teachers, aware of the significance of collective action, can take the lead in building partnerships, encouraging collaboration, and creating opportunities for these stakeholders to contribute to climate change education. Drawing on the leadership and guidance inherent in their profession, teachers can empower students to become informed, responsible, and active individuals committed to building a sustainable future.

Key Messages

  • Climate change is an urgent and undeniable reality, with human activities driving rising temperatures and environmental threats.
  • Teachers are in a strategic position to inspire the behaviors needed to mitigate its impacts and promote a more sustainable future. 
  • Climate change education should extend beyond simply presenting facts. Teachers must integrate knowledge, critical thinking, action, emotions, and values to foster meaningful engagement and empower students to actively contribute to climate change solutions.
  • Teachers need to find effective ways to teach climate change, adopting approaches that engage students in meaningful, interactive, and creative ways, rather than relying on traditional lecture-based methods.
  • A whole-institution approach fosters collective climate action, with teachers playing a key role in building partnerships and encouraging collaboration among all stakeholders, including principals, students, families, and community members.

References and further reading

Anderson, A. (2012). Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/09734082124751

Beach, R. (2023). Addressing the challenges of preparing teachers to teach about the climate crisis. The Teacher Educator, 58(4), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2023.2175401

Bentz, J. (2020). Learning about climate change in, with and through art. Climatic Change,162(3), 1595-1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02804-4

Cantell, H., Tolppanen, S., Aarnio-Linnanvuori, E., & Lehtonen, A. (2019). Bicycle model on climate change education: Presenting and evaluating a model. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1570487

Creutzig, F., & Kapmeier, F. (2020). Engage, don’t preach: Active learning triggers climate action. Energy Research & Social Science, 70 (101779), 1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101779

Hargis, K., McKenzie, M., & Levert-Chiasson, I. (2021). A whole institution approach to climate change education: Preparing schools to be climate proactive. In R. Iyengar and C. T. Kwauk (Eds), Curriculum and learning for climate action: Toward an SDG 4.7 roadmap for systems change (pp. 43-66). Boston: BRILL. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004471818   

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842

NASA. (2025). ClimateKids. https://climatekids.nasa.gov/climate-change/.

Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’and a ‘hand’in redressing climate change. Children’s Geographies, 18(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532

Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). What is climate change education? Curriculum Perspectives, 37, 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9 

Tibola da Rocha, V., Brandli, L. L., & Kalil, R. M. L. (2020). Climate change education in school: knowledge, behavior and attitude. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 649-670.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0341

United Nations. (2023). What Is climate change? https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change

UNESCO. (2024). Greening curriculum guidance: Teaching and learning for climate action. https://doi.org/10.54675/AOOZ1758

World Meteorological Organization (2024). State of the climate 2024: Update for COP29.https://library.wmo.int/records/item/69075-state-of-the-climate-2024

Hasret Baş

Hasret Baş

Student, Sinop University, Türkiye

Hasret Baş is a master’s student in the field of Curriculum and Instruction at Sı̇nop University, Türkiye. Her research interests include climate change education and curriculum studies. She is currently writing a thesis on climate change education and also works as a teacher in a public school.

İlknur Özbebek

İlknur Özbebek

Student, Hacettepe University, Türkiye

İlknur Özbebek is a doctoral student in Curriculum and Instruction at Hacettepe University, Türkiye. Her research interests include culture, ethnomathematics, curriculum and instruction. She is currently working as a research assistant at Sinop University.

Dr. Rahime Çobanoğlu

Dr. Rahime Çobanoğlu

Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction, Sinop University, Türkiye

Rahime Çobanoğlu is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction at Sinop University, Türkiye. Her research interests focus on teacher practices, curriculum implementation, and teacher beliefs. She is currently supervising a thesis on climate change education.

Rethinking citizenship: Global challenges and the role of education

Rethinking citizenship: Global challenges and the role of education

by | NW 23 Policy Studies and Politics of Education, NW 7 Social Justice and Intercultural Education

The paradox of universal rights and freedoms being exclusively reserved for members of a nation-state through national citizenship has led me to explore the newly emerging ideas of global citizenship and global citizenship education (GCED). While global forms of citizenship aim to transcend the particularism of national rights, the role of education in fostering these ideals is central—especially in Europe, where regional frameworks like the European Union (EU) already provide an intermediary model between national and global citizenship. Yet, these frameworks are constrained by institutional and political realities, as citizenship remains fundamentally rooted in national legal systems. This raises critical questions about the feasibility of transnational citizenship and the extent to which educational initiatives can genuinely reshape these structures.

The interplay between global and European citizenship

Few would dispute that all individuals, regardless of nationality, are entitled to fundamental rights such as life, liberty, and education (United Nations, 1948). Yet, the institutionalisation of these rights predominantly occurs at the national level (Oman, 2009, p. 280-281), creating tensions between the universality of rights and the particularism of national citizenship (Fudge, 2004, p. 32). Global citizenship is often framed as a way to overcome these limitations, yet its feasibility remains contested.

In Europe, however, the EU provides a unique context where, although citizenship is confined to a single nation-state, rights and freedoms extend across member states (The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000). The EU’s concept of citizenship, established under the Maastricht Treaty (1992), includes rights such as free movement, the ability to work and reside in any member state, and access to supranational legal protections. While this model showcases the potential of regional cooperation, its implementation remains uneven, with significant disparities in how member states apply and enforce these rights. Persistent challenges include restrictions on labor mobility, unequal access to social welfare systems, and the treatment of migrants and asylum seekers, highlighting the complexities of balancing national sovereignty with transnational governance.

Education as a catalyst for citizenship beyond borders

Education plays a pivotal role in shaping how individuals understand and enact citizenship. As part of broader efforts to reimagine civic education, UNESCO has promoted Global Citizenship Education (GCED) to foster a sense of interconnectedness and ethical responsibility in a globalised world. Schools are increasingly seen not just as places for academic instruction, but as spaces where students learn to navigate complex global realities and develop ethical, inclusive perspectives (UNESCO, 2014).

Officially launched by the UN in 2012, GCED is a ‘framing paradigm’ that calls for ‘multifaceted,’ ‘transformative,’ and ‘lifelong’ civic learning (UNESCO, 2015, p. 15). Enshrined in Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Target 4.7, it combines ‘formal and informal approaches, curricular and extracurricular interventions, and conventional and unconventional pathways to participation’ (UNESCO, 2015) with the aim of developing core competencies in learners, including:

a) Deep knowledge of global issues and universal values like justice, equality, and dignity

b) Cognitive skills for critical, systemic, and multi-perspective thinking

c) Non-cognitive skills such as empathy, conflict resolution, and cross-cultural communication

d) Behavioural capacities to act collaboratively and responsibly for the collective good (UNESCO, 2013).

However, these aspirations remain largely theoretical, as the challenge lies in bridging this vision with concrete implementation strategies that can be adapted to diverse educational systems.

Challenges and prospects in global citizenship education

Despite its potential, GCED faces notable conceptual and practical challenges. One concern is UNESCO’s “thin” conceptualisation of global citizenship, which does not fully address the role of the nation-state, the legal basis of citizenship rights, or the responsibilities that come with them. This ambiguity limits its effectiveness as a policy framework. A related challenge is its implementation. While UNESCO supports national efforts through curriculum development and learning materials, its influence remains largely advisory. Member states submit progress reports to UNESCO’s Executive Board every four years, yet the ‘Recommendation on Education for Peace and Human Rights, International Understanding, Cooperation, Fundamental Freedoms, Global Citizenship, and Sustainable Development’ (2023) remains a non-binding guidance document rather than a legally binding framework. This weakens its capacity to ensure meaningful integration across diverse national contexts.

Additionally, UNESCO’s discourse has increasingly emphasised preparing education systems for so-called ‘future’ challenges rather than addressing the structural barriers that already hinder effective responses to global issues (Mochizuki & Vickers, 2024). This shift also reflects a broader trend toward the depoliticisation of education policy discussions. As a result, UNESCO’s global citizenship agenda appears to prioritise seemingly apolitical, simplistic solutions to global challenges—an approach that not only restricts political debate but also diverts attention from socio-economic injustices and weakens civic agency (Bryan, 2022). This raises concerns about whether GCED can truly empower learners to challenge dominant global structures rather than simply adapt to them.

At the same time, global challenges such as climate change, migration, and social inequality require collective solutions, such as global citizenship education. While GCED alone cannot resolve these issues, it offers a valuable framework for fostering civic engagement and ethical responsibility across borders. However, without clearer institutional backing and mechanisms for accountability, its impact remains uneven. A crucial challenge lies in moving beyond broad rhetoric to establish sustainable pathways for integrating GCED into national education systems in ways that complement existing structures.

Towards an integrated model of citizenship education

In Europe, citizenship education already covers the EU’s institutions, functions, integration processes, and core values, fostering both awareness and a sense of belonging to the EU community (Bacian & Huemer, 2023). Expanding this framework to incorporate global citizenship could help learners develop the skills and knowledge needed to engage with increasingly interconnected social, economic, and environmental challenges. The EU itself serves as a tangible model of transnational belonging, demonstrating how rights and responsibilities can extend beyond national borders. However, meaningful transnational citizenship depends on strong institutional frameworks, legal mechanisms, and sustained political cooperation – elements that, while central to the EU model, remain unevenly developed and contested within the Union itself.

While the EU has institutionalised transnational citizenship on a regional scale, its limitations highlight the challenges of implementing GCED on a global level, such as discrepancies in the enforcement of rights, restrictions on labor mobility, and the treatment of migrants – issues that reveal the difficulty of extending citizenship beyond the nation-state.

Despite these challenges, education remains one of the most promising tools for fostering mutual understanding and preparing individuals to engage with global issues in meaningful ways. To maximise its impact, greater institutional collaboration is needed to ensure that education policies are responsive to the realities of citizenship in a globalised world. GCED has the potential to bridge national and transnational civic engagement, but this requires translating its principles into concrete policies and practices that equip learners with the tools to navigate both local and global challenges effectively. By critically assessing both the opportunities and constraints of transnational citizenship, we can move beyond theoretical discussions and work toward a more inclusive and actionable model of civic education.

Key Messages

  • There is a tension between the absolute universalism of fundamental rights and the enduring particularism of their institutionalisation through national citizenship.
  • With state institutions serving as the primary mechanisms for exercising rights and freedoms, human rights are intrinsically linked to national citizenship.
  • Global Citizenship Education (GCE), envisioned as a means to foster universal values, is proposed as a potential solution to this tension.
  • GCE encourages us to reimagine education as a lifelong process that nurtures a sense of belonging not only to a nation but also to a global community.
Dr. Aikerim Bektemirova

Dr. Aikerim Bektemirova

Aikerim Bektemirova recently completed her PhD in Education at the University of Cambridge. Her primary research interests lie at the intersection of education and political sociology. Prior to her PhD, Aikerim earned an MPhil in Education, Globalisation, and International Development, also from the University of Cambridge. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and International Relations from Nazarbayev University in Astana, Kazakhstan.

Other blog posts on similar topics:

References and Further Reading

Appiah, K. (2007). Global Citizenship. Fordham L. Review, 75(5), 2375. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol75/iss5/3/

Bacian, I. &Huemer, M. (2023). Citizenship education in national curricula. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2023)747459

Bosniak, L. (2000). Citizenship Denationalized. SSRN Electronic Journal, 7, 447. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol7/iss2/2/

Bryan, A. (2022). From ‘the conscience of humanity’ to the conscious human brain: UNESCO’s embrace of social-emotional learning as a flag of convenience. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(5), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2022.2129956

European Parliament. (2000). The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf

European Parliament. (1992). Treaty on European Union (TEU) / Maastricht Treaty. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/maastricht-treaty

Frey, B. (2001). Flexible Citizenship for a Global Society. SSRN Electronic Journal.Available at:  https://www.bsfrey.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/flexible-citizenship-for-a-global-society.pdf

Fudge, J. (2014). Making claims for migrant workers: human rights and citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 18(1), 29-45. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13621025.2014.865894

Gholami, R. (2016). The art of self-making: identity and citizenship education in late-modernity. British Journal Of Sociology Of Education, 38(6), 798-811. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01425692.2016.1182006

Hansen, R. (2014). Citizenship and Integration in Europe. In Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States (1st ed., pp. 87-109). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305246077_Citizenship_and_Integration_in_Europe

Koh, H. H. (1999). How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced? Indiana Law Journal, 74(4), 9th ser., 1397-1417. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2279&context=ilj

Nash, K. (2009). Between Citizenship and Human Rights. Sociology, 43(6), 1067-1083. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0038038509345702

Mochizuki, Y., & Vickers, E. (2024). Still ‘the conscience of humanity’? UNESCO’s vision of education for peace, sustainable development and global citizenship. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(5), 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2024.2371259

Oman, N. (2010). Hannah Arendt’s “Right to Have Rights”: A Philosophical Context for Human Security. Journal of Human Rights, 9(3), 279-302. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3394297

UNESCO. (2013). Outcome document of the Technical Consultation on Global Citizenship Education: Global Citizenship Education – An Emerging Perspective. Available at:https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000224115

UNESCO. (2014). Global Citizenship Education. Preparing learners for the challenges of the twenty-first century.Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227729

UNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education. Topics and Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993

UNESCO. (2023). Recommendation on Education for Peace and Human Rights, International Understanding, Cooperation, Fundamental Freedoms, Global Citizenship and Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO. Available at :https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-education-peace-and-human-rights-international-understanding-cooperation-fundamental

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available at:https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

 

A collective becoming of emerging environmental and sustainability education researchers

A collective becoming of emerging environmental and sustainability education researchers

by | NW 30 Environmental and Sustainability Education Research, ESER

 It is not surprising that a group of individuals interested in Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) would share values and common interests. Yet, it would perhaps be surprising if a meeting of such individuals resulted in the creation of an almost ‘ready-made’ community. And that this community – of people who work in very different fields, with diverse backgrounds and life experiences – would willingly forgo the competitive nature of performative academic events, but rather adopt an openness that disarmed from the outset.
“One of the most important experiences on the PhD journey.” 

This may seem like a hyperbolic description of the four days of Transformative Learning in Sustainability: a pluriversal approach Seasonal School in Karlsruhe, funded by EERA’s NW 30 and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), but the event enabled interactions that have influenced and informed our lives as Early Career Researchers (ECRs).

To express and perhaps explain the experience, we offer five aspects of researcher identity emergent at the Seasonal School: place and becoming, embodied, connected, brave, and hopeful. We want to share our collective experience to show the importance of participating in in-person Seasonal Schools as ECRs to network, find/create community and engage in exchange through the lens of transformative learning.

We have written collectively and used ‘we’ in most instances. Our individual voices have also been included as ‘I’. The use of ‘we’ refers to the six co-authors – we appreciate the experiences of other participants and mentors may differ.

Caterpillars on a verdant bush

Image Description: A picture of something symbolising our research from a walk in the Schlossgarten as we got to know the surroundings. This one symbolises emotions one may feel when encountering something new, such as disgust, fear, hope, and joy. Credit: Emma Heikkilä. 

Place and becoming

“In less than a week, I felt more at home in Karlsruhe than I do in the town where I was born and raised.”

The fan-shaped city of Karlsruhe was central to our experience. With the embodied experience of journeying to Germany’s early summer, one could not but smile. The trees were already green, people were spending time in the park, and one could easily sit in a Biergarten. There was something homely about Karlsruhe, a peaceful atmosphere – no wonder the name Karlsruhe translates from German to “Karl’s peace”. 

Most of us were surprised by how much time we spent outside the formal settings of KIT, having experienced conferences where connection with the surroundings is optional. The first activity was to silently walk in the Schlossgarten. Later, we felt warmly welcomed at Kulturküche – an experimental public space for art and culture- for our first dinner. Another evening, we were led on a beautifully curated ‘sustainable city walking tour’, where we encountered a permanent high-top circus tent, community gardens, and eastern Karlsruhe, which turned our attention to the residents’ lives.

Raised planting beds in a communal garden filled with vegetables and herbs
Image Description: Karlsruhe Community Gardens, May 2024. Credit: Eleftheria Iakovidou

Embodied

“I cannot describe the affective relation to Karlsruhe in other words than “I fell in love with Karlsruhe.”

Often, we find ourselves as minds in front of a computer, but in Karlsruhe, we were learning, participating, and researching in an embodied way. The long, immersive days surrounded us with like-minded individuals as we collectively sought deeper understandings of ESE research and practice. 

Beginning with a programme of workshops and talks, including a world café event, we had opportunities to connect, deepened by sharing our vegetarian meals. The programme kept us moving; we took our whole selves outside, made maps, walked, chatted, and wrote. We had moved into a liminal space, set apart from our usual routine and places and were invited into this new space, to think with new objects, people, and ideas.

More uncomfortable learning spaces were those that challenged us, invited us to consider other methodological perspectives, and learn from contextual circumstances in different countries. They also showed us the value of coming together as a diverse group of ECRs. Through conversations with others, with clay, and with ourselves in our diaries, we could sit with feelings of discomfort – physical, emotional and mental –  that were raised during the Seasonal School. Slowly, the discomfort faded.

A group of people sit in a park, surrounded by trees

Image Description: Participants writing in their diaries while sitting in Schlossgarten, close to KIT. Credit: Julia Skilton.

Connected

“I will remember Karlsruhe as a defining aspect of my PhD – deepening my thinking, feeling and connections.”

During those four days, we experienced a dual connection between ourselves and with the environment. What started with an outdoor getting-to-know-you activity slowly developed into a sense of community. The variety of structured and unstructured activities created spaces for us to connect over shared use of theoretical frameworks, links between our projects, mutual personal interests and shared ideas. Experiential learning activities in diverse settings, such as the university park, allowed us to connect with the environment. In conversations with clay, we realised the ways we affected the clay and how it affected us; learning to listen to its voice, experiment, and explore creative avenues.

This allowed us to connect with the more-than-human world through embodied experiences, and engage in collective discussions and collaboration. The notion of a network driven by more than impact and outcomes was important to our discussions throughout the four days and in our plans to collaborate in the future. Karlsruhe has been a significant part of our journey of connecting with others and the environment, and ‘becoming’ sustainable education researchers.

Image Description: Selected clay artefacts from our “Conversations with Clay” Session. Credit: Sarah Strachan.

Brave

“Sustainability isn’t all beauty and loveliness – it means facing up to challenging uncomfortable situations and working forward with it.” 

As ECRs, there is pressure to present our work. Often before we are comfortable with it ourselves, we share our work with others who usually want to critique (or criticise) our ideas and methods. Despite our shared motivation to build research careers, during the Seasonal School, there was a lack of competition that is often present at similar events. In presenting our research through a poster and small group discussion, we shared concerns and ideas about things that excited us, which we felt would inform each other’s work.

Through activities where no one was an expert, we gained confidence in the support available. In accepting our vulnerability, we were made brave. Our differences enabled us to stand apart together and share without fear. Together, we embraced being in a liminal space on our shared PhD journeys, a place where we set aside our egos without even realising it.

Image Description: Statue of ‘Der Denker’ made by Karl-Heinz Krause in Schlossgarten. Credit: Emma Heikkilä.

Hopeful

What initially connected us is our ESE research, which is entangled with the horrors of climate change, environmental disasters, and gross exploitation. Simultaneously, we are learning to navigate complex and unsustainable structures of academia (continuous competition for resources, high pressure on publishing, and efficiency requirements). Finding ourselves in the midst of working with emotionally challenging topics, we may feel alone and exhausted under the burden of the “publish or perish” mentality. We shared our thoughts on this in a dedicated fishbowl discussion.

We addressed hope and hopelessness, and many agreed that we cannot accept hopelessness. However, it often seems as if the work is left to the individual to not give up. Where do we find hope? Can we research if we are hopeless? Maybe hope should not be seen as a stable, binary matter. Hopelessness may also elucidate valuable insights of what to prioritise, and how to (re)gain hope.

Hope can be found in connections to others – finding a sense of belonging, being with each other and reaching the person behind the professional. Sharing our messy ideas, half-baked thoughts, and insecurities requires courage and vulnerability, but in the community formed, this became possible. 

We met like-minded colleagues, and those with different ideas from our own, which deepened our perspectives. We were able to think and be active in embodied, emotional and spiritual ways. This reminds us that we are vulnerable embodied beings, and helps us to embrace that. We realised that we are already part of the ESER community of practice, and that this opens up opportunities for collaboration on future ESE research and beyond.

A group of people sitting at a restaurant table

Image Description: Group of participants sitting at a long table having dinner in a former slaughterhouse now restaurant ‘Fettschmelze’. Credit: Olivia Wohlfart.

Concluding thoughts

To build on this young ESE PhD network formed in four days, we created an online group to keep in touch. The idea of writing and sharing our collective experiences emerged. Putting our thoughts into words – together – has not only helped make our reflections more concrete but has also been a way for us to nurture the connections formed in Karlsruhe. Education is so much more than measurable, tangible ‘outputs’. We didn’t leave the Seasonal School having ticked the boxes of certain learning outcomes. Rather, the process became part of us, and we bring it with us on our evolving paths. We reflect whether the experience will continue to influence us as researchers, educators, and citizens, and if so – how?

The Seasonal School shaped our identity as researchers through place-based, embodied and collective experiences. Being part of a supportive ECR community helped us realise that through collaboration, we can better negotiate the unknown future, whether this relates to our PhD journeys, or sustainability issues generally. 

We hope that our reflections inspire future ECRs to experience Seasonal Schools and highlight the enormous value in organising in-person events which bring ECRs from diverse countries, disciplines and backgrounds together.

Key Messages

  • Sharing our ECR experience, we highlight the value of participating in in-person opportunities to find community and engage in exchange.
  • Embodied experiences relating with people and place are fundamental to Environmental and Sustainability Education.
  • Our reflections exemplify the possibility of transformative learning experiences in academia.
  • Environmental and Sustainability Education is more than measurable outcomes.
Authors

Authors

Penelope Williams, University of Bristol, UK https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0511-400X 

Julia Römer, Glasgow School of Art, UK https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5986-8478 

Julia Skilton, University of Edinburgh, UK https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0292-244X 

Caroline Kocel, Anglia Ruskin University, UK https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0740-7783 

Emma Heikkilä, University of Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-575X 

Eleftheria Iakovidou, University of Gloucestershire, UK https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1699-6123

Infobox

Overview: Seasonal School 2024

KIT – Institut für Schulpädagogik und Didaktik (ISD) Kooperationen – International – Seasonal School 2024 – Programme

NW 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research, ESER – Seasonal School 2024 | EERA

Mentors:
Dr Olivia Wohlfart, Dr Elsa Lee, Dr Jonas Lysgaard, Prof Alan Reid, Sarah Strachan

Other blog posts on similar topics:

Children’s rights and the importance of research into school disciplinary practices

Children’s rights and the importance of research into school disciplinary practices

by | NW 25 Research on Children's Rights in Education

Childhood experiences, both at home and in school, play a fundamental role in shaping an individual’s life trajectory. Educational experts emphasize that parents and teachers significantly influence children’s well-being, with teachers playing a particularly crucial role in shaping young minds. Since children spend a substantial amount of time in schools and afterschool learning centers, understanding the dynamics within these environments is essential. Studying teachers’ behavior management strategies offers an opportunity to foster safe, nurturing, and positive learning environments for students.

According to UNICEF (2023), nearly one billion children globally, aged 2-17, experience some form of violence, including within schools. This violence encompasses both physical and emotional abuse inflicted by teachers and school staff (Scharpf et al., 2022).  Therefore, violence against children in schools is a pressing concern, as it negatively impacts children’s well-being worldwide (Durrant & Ensom, 2012; WHO, 2020). Addressing this issue requires urgent attention from policymakers, as well as the implementation of effective intervention strategies (End Violence Against Children, 2021).

The link between child maltreatment and violent discipline methods

What does it mean to discipline?

The term “discipline” often carries negative connotations. Derived from the Latin words discipulus (pupil) and disciplina (teaching), discipline refers to the imparting of knowledge or skills, often within the context of adherence to a specific code of conduct. In a typical classroom setting, students are expected to pay attention, follow the teacher’s instructions, complete their homework, and respect their peers, among other things.

Wilson (1982) argued that discipline and punishment are not synonymous. Similarly, Friedman and Friedman (1977) also clearly distinguished between corporal punishment and discipline. However, these terms are often mistaken or  misunderstood as being the same.

Child discipline is a crucial aspect of teaching and is universally recognized as essential for teaching self-control and acceptable behavior (Gershoff, 2017). Schools are similarly expected to shape the behavior of children. However, inflicting pain through physical and psychological punishments is not an acceptable form of discipline. Such practices not only violate children’s rights but also cause significant harm to their growth and development (UNICEF, 2010). While debates surrounding the use of physical and psychological disciplinary practices continue, there is a growing need for actionable policies that can be effectively implemented in schools worldwide.

Numerous studies indicate that “violent disciplinary” practices are the most common form of violence against children, perpetrated by both caregivers and teachers (Krug et al., 2002). In some cases, these practices escalate into child abuse, highlighting the connection between disciplinary methods and violence. As a result, violent child discipline is recognized as a form of child maltreatment, which not only affects the child’s well-being but also carries long-term socio-economic consequences for society (Meadows et al., 2011). Thus, child discipline practices are a critical component of any education system and are also aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): Quality Education (SDG:4) and Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions (SDG:16).

Psychological punishment – why it deserves attention

While the discussion surrounding disciplinary practices often focuses on physical punishment, psychological and verbal punishment has garnered less attention in academic literature (Ferrara et al., 2019). Although this form of discipline is pervasive, it remains underreported, unrecognized, and consequently less researched in various contexts (Bellis et al., 2023; Theoklitou et al., 2012).

Examples of harsh verbal punishment or psychologically aggressive discipline include screaming, yelling, swearing at a child, or labeling them as “stupid,” “deaf,” or “lazy.” These behaviors are intended to inflict emotional distress, either actively or passively. While such actions may sometimes be unintentional, they are typically employed in an attempt to correct or manage a child’s misbehavior. The long-term emotional and psychological consequences of these practices are far-reaching, yet they remain underexplored in many studies (Wang & Kenny, 2014; Witt et al., 2017). Child verbal abuse is even more overlooked in the school context (Bellis et al., 2023; Slep et al., 2022). It is crucial to recognize that these practices also violate children’s human rights, as defined by the UNCRC, and need focus and attention from researchers and policymakers.

Consequences of violent school disciplinary practices

The effects of violent disciplinary practices are profound and far-reaching, impacting children’s growth, development, and well-being (Abbasi et al., 2015; Durrant, 2005; Greydanus et al., 2003). Research consistently shows that children who experience violence or humiliation are more likely to develop negative character traits, engage in antisocial behaviors, and struggle academically  (Straus, 1994). The detrimental effects of such practices extend beyond childhood, manifesting in long-term consequences such as alcohol and substance abuse, low self-esteem, impaired cognitive abilities, poor self-regulation, and increased aggression (Gershoff, 2002).

Children who are frequently subjected to school violence are more vulnerable to bullying. In some tragic cases, children who endure humiliation and shaming from violent school disciplinary practices have been pushed to suicide, driven by the physical and psychological pain inflicted on them. Additionally, violence is often learned and passed down across generations, perpetuating a cycle of abuse (Holden et al., 2014; Straus & Field, 2003).

Key insights from literature

Through a literature review conducted as part of my Ph.D. research project, which included an international comparative analysis of violence against children with a focus on child discipline practices in schools, several key insights about violence against children in schools emerged:

Children’s voices are missing
There has been minimal attention given to understanding how children, as victims, perceive disciplinary practices in schools, and the extent to which violent punishment continues to be employed (Plan International, 2006). While physical abuse has declined in some regions, emotional abuse has increased and is often normalized as an alternative form of discipline (Dube et al., 2023).

 

Teacher awareness and legal compliance
Although teachers have largely moved away from corporal punishment due to legal bans, this may not be a result of increased awareness of the long-term adverse effects of corporal punishment), but rather it is more associated with the fear of legal consequences (Gershoff, 2017, Krug et al., 2002).

The role of environment in learning
Decades of research have shown that children learn from their environment, influenced by factors such as family, school, and society (Bandura & Walters, 1963; Bandura, 2005; Baumrind, 1966). Teachers, after parents, play a critical role in shaping children’s lives. Therefore, involving all these stakeholders—parents, teachers, and children—in research studies concerning child discipline is essential for a holistic understanding and the formulation of effective policies (Hegde in Beckel et al., 2024).


Need for rigorous research
Despite the severe effects of violent disciplinary practices, there is still insufficient empirical research on the methods used in school contexts (Pinheiro, 2006). Additionally, there remains a lack of open dialogue between teachers, parents, and students, and a need for more methodologically sound research (WHO, 2020). The sensitive nature of this topic continues to make it a taboo subject, further hindering comprehensive study.

Prohibiting and eliminating corporal punishment is a human rights imperative; from a human rights perspective, the suggestion that children from non-European cultures should be afforded less protection than their European counterparts is of course entirely unacceptable. No culture owns corporal punishment but all have a responsibility to disown it. 

End Violence Against Children

Working Paper, End Corporal Punishment, 2021

Reflections and Conclusion

As we reflect on this issue, several critical questions arise:

  • Are we doing enough to protect children’s rights in schools?
  • How effective has the abolition of corporal punishment been?
  • What efforts are being made to implement and enforce policies that protect children from violence at school level?
  • Are we doing enough towards evidence-based policy interventions that protect children by providing alternative classroom behavior management strategies, and a safe learning atmosphere?

To conclude, the use of corporal punishment and other violent disciplinary methods, including psychological abuse and aggressive verbal discipline, constitutes a violation of children’s rights. International human rights law emphasizes that children have a right to legal protection against corporal punishment in all contexts of their lives. Despite the widespread legal bans on corporal punishment, violence against children continues globally, regardless of a country’s development status (End Violence Against Children, 2021; UNCRC, 2006).

Protecting children from violence is a global responsibility, and more must be done to ensure that children’s rights are upheld in schools.

Key Messages

  • We need to do more to prevent violence against children in schools
  • There is a need to focus more on psychological punishments and effective implementation of alternative positive disciplinary practices in schools.
  • Providing a safe learning environment and protecting children’s rights in schools should be the priority and collective responsibility of all stakeholders.
  • Research should focus on studying all key stakeholders including children—to gain a holistic understanding of violence against children in the school context, since children are surrounded by various factors.
  • Research should be conducted globally, without being limited by the economic or arbitrary developmental status of countries because violence against children occurs across the world.
Shweta Hegde

Shweta Hegde

Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

Shweta Hegde is a PhD candidate in the Educational Psychology department at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg.

Her research focuses on “Violence Against Children,” specifically examining child disciplinary practices in school and home contexts an international study. With decades of experience in the social sector at both national and international levels, Shweta has a deep commitment to addressing child and women’s issues. She is also a founding member of the non-profit initiative Pragyam Foundation in Bangalore, India. Her passion for education and social justice drives her research and advocacy efforts.

Other blog posts on similar topics:

References and Further Reading

Abbasi, M. A., Saeidi, M., Khademi, G., Hoseini, B. L., & Moghadam, Z. E. (2015). Child maltreatment in the worldwide: A review article. International Journal of Pediatrics, 3(1.1), 353–365.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269988368_Child_Maltreatment_in_the_Worldwide_A_Review_Article

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.  Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1977-25733-001

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://d37djvu3ytnwxt.cloudfront.net/assets/courseware/v1/e57a5dfc0367fe26ee4ff80c9433e74e/asset-v1:USMx+LDT100x+2T2017_2+type@asset+block/Bandura2005.pdf 

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1963-35030-000

Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887-907. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126611

Bellis, M. A., Hughes, K., Cresswell, K., & Ford, K. (2023). Comparing relationships between single types of adverse childhood experiences and health-related outcomes: A combined primary data study of eight cross-sectional surveys in England and Wales. BMJ Open, 13(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072916

Dube, S. R., Li, E. T., Fiorini, G., Lin, C., Singh, N., Khamisa, K., McGowan, J., & Fonagy, P. (2023). Childhood verbal abuse as a child maltreatment subtype: A systematic review of the current evidence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 144,106394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106394

Durrant, J. E. (2005). Distinguishing physical punishment from physical abuse: Implications for professionals. Envision: The Manitoba Journal of Child Welfare, 4(1), 86-92.

Durrant, J., & Ensom, R. (2012). Physical punishment of children: Lessons from 20 years of research. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(12), 1373-1377. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101314

End Violence Against Children. (2021). Corporal punishment of children: Review of research on its impact and associations. September, 1-35. https://endcorporalpunishment.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Research-effects-full-working-paper-2021.pdf

Ferrara, P., Franceschini, G., Villani, A., & Corsello, G. (2019). Physical, psychological and social impact of school violence on children. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 45(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-019-0669-z

Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539

Gershoff, E. T. (2010). More harm than good: A summary of scientific research on the intended and unintended effects of corporal punishment on children. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73(2), 31-56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8386132/

Gershoff, E. T. (2017). School corporal punishment in global perspective: Prevalence, outcomes, and efforts at intervention. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22, 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2016.1271955

Greydanus, D. E., Pratt, H. D., Spates, C. R., Blake-Dreher, A. E., Greydanus-Gearhart, M. A., & Patel, D. R. (2003). Corporal punishment in schools: Position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32(5), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00042-9

Hegde, S. (2024). Violence against children: A theoretical perspective. In L. Beckel, T. Maschke & F. Stein (Eds.), BILDUNGSGERECHTIGKEIT: Transformation – Empowerment – Sustainability (pp. 267-279). Residenz Verlag.

Holden, G. W., Brown, A. S., Baldwin, A. S., & Caderao, K. C. (2014). Research findings can change attitudes about corporal punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(5), 902-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.013

Krug, E. G., Mercy, J. A., Dahlberg, L. L., & Zwi, A. B. (2002). The world report on violence and health. The Lancet, 360(9339), 1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0

Lansford, J. E., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2012). Childrearing discipline and violence in developing countries. Child Development, 83(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01676.x

Meadows, P., Tunstill, J., George, A., Dhudwar, A., & Kurtz, Z. (2011). The costs and consequences of child maltreatment: Literature review for the NSPCC. National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

Morrow, V., & Singh, R. (2014). Corporal punishment in schools in Andhra Pradesh, India: Children’s and parents’ views. Young Lives. ISBN: 978-1-909403-37-6 https://www.younglives.org.uk/sites/www.younglives.org.uk/files/YL-WP123_Morrow-and-Singh_School%20Violence.pdf

Pinheiro, P. S. (2006). World report on violence against children. Geneva: United Nations.

Plan International. (2006). Impact of corporal punishment on school children: A research study. https://www.planindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Plan-Repo-Corporal-Punishment-compressed.pdf

Scharpf, F., Kızıltepe, R., Kirika, A., & Hecker, T. (2023). A systematic review of the prevalence and correlates of emotional violence by teachers. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2581-2597. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15248380221102559

Shawar, Y. R., & Shiffman, J. (2021). A global priority: Addressing violence against children. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 99(6), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.247874

Slep, A. M. S., Glaser, D., & Manly, J. T. (2022). Psychological maltreatment: An operationalized definition and path toward application. Child Abuse & Neglect, 134, 105882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105882

Straus, M. A., & Kantor, G. K. (1994). Corporal punishment of adolescents by parents: A risk factor in the epidemiology of depression, suicide, alcohol abuse, child abuse, and wife beating. Adolescence, 29(115), 543–561. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7832020/

Straus, M. A., & Field, C. J. (2003). Psychological Aggression by American Parents: National Data on Prevalence, Chronicity, and Severity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00795.x

Theoklitou, D., Kabitsis, N., & Kabitsi, A. (2012). Physical and emotional abuse of primary school children by teachers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.05.007

United Nations Children’s Fund (2010). Child disciplinary practices at home: evidence from a range of low- and middle-income countries. New York: UNICEF. https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-disciplinary-practices-at-home-evidence-from-a-range-of-low-and-middle-income-countries/

United Nations Children’s Fund. (2017). A familiar face: Violence in the lives of children and adolescents. New York: UNICEF.

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2006). General comment No. 8: The right of the child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment. Committee on the Rights of the Child, 8(8), 15.

Wang, M. T., & Kenny, S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers’ and mothers’ harsh verbal discipline and adolescents’ conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85(3), 908-923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12143

Witt, A., Brown, R. C., Plener, P. L., et al. (2017). Child maltreatment in Germany: Prevalence rates in the general population. Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health, 11, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0185-0

World Health Organization. (2020). Global status report on preventing violence against children 2020. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240004191

Behind closed doors – Understanding how local politicians influence school allocation

Behind closed doors – Understanding how local politicians influence school allocation

by | NW 23 Policy Studies and Politics of Education

Every year, parents across Europe and beyond face the pivotal choice of which school is the most suitable for their children. But do they truly have as much choice as they believe? Through his exploration into the allocation of primary school places in the case of Berlin’s inner-city district, Dabisch’s (2022) European Education Research Journal article sheds light on the significant role of local politicians in shaping and executing national education policies. As the universal pursuit of educational equality remains a distant goal, these findings prompt a deeper reflection on the current complexities of educational governance and the nuanced influence of the ‘local’ in achieving educational equality on a European and global scale.

The debate surrounding school allocation

In discussions about school allocation, the concept of ‘choice’ stands as a central and contentious issue. While parental influence has been a focal point in recent media coverage (see this article by Forbes), it is essential to recognise the role of local political actors, who play a crucial part in establishing catchment areas, challenging institutional reputations, and ensuring equal educational opportunities.

Berlin’s historical legacy as a city divided into districts, each presenting unique challenges and characteristics, enriches this discussion. Since 1949, parents have had the option to choose a school outside their catchment area, a reform that has arguably heightened social segregation and competition. Navigating this complex allocation system falls on the shoulders of district elected department heads, highlighting the critical role they play in shaping educational access and outcomes.

Research findings

Dabisch’s (2022) study, based on interviews with three department heads, reveals significant differences in the implementation of federal regulations regarding primary school place allocation across Berlin’s district.

Despite a shared acknowledgement of the importance of providing sufficient primary school places within walking distance for children and improving the reputation of undersubscribed schools, contextual factors such as population size, available school places, and historical catchment areas profoundly influence decision-making (p.823). For instance, the challenges posed by high student populations in districts A and B constrained the department heads’ ability to achieve their objectives, prompting them to perceive their influence on allocation as limited (p.826).

Far from conforming to rational decision-making, department heads’ decisions and policy interpretations were heavily influenced by their political beliefs. Social-democratic heads, for example, prioritised social diversity, while the conservative head’s commitment was conditional on alignment with parental interests, reflecting broader political values and priorities (p.826).

Interestingly, the fragmented responses observed among Berlin’s district heads were linked to the absence of a unified emphasis on catchment areas within the city’s teacher unions (p.827). This lack of cohesive guidance impedes efforts to address competition and limit choice dynamics amongst parents, highlighting the need for greater coordination within local communities.

Implications beyond Berlin’s borders

What does this reveal about the direction of education policy in Europe? The last decade has witnessed a gradual shift towards ‘decentralization’, which refers to the process of granting more power to local educational authorities. Whilst this system may promote democratic choice and innovation in education, Dabisch’s (2022) findings highlight that it can also result in fragmented schooling and exacerbated disparities amongst schools, ultimately perpetuating social inequalities.

 Where you go to school, and consequently school allocation processes, matter (see in this Sutton Trust Report). As decentralisation continues, mitigating these distinctions amongst schools and achieving the global aim of ensuring “inclusive and equitable quality education…for all” by 2030 (United Nations, 2018) depends more than ever on local actors to implement national policy effectively. This is especially crucial considering that it is the quality of enactment, rather than the policy itself, that is pivotal for educational improvement (Nordholm et al,2022:1).

Ultimately, these findings demonstrate the importance of finding a balance between central and local responsibilities in European educational governance when such local disparities persist. Achieving this balance is crucial for effective policy enactment, adapting to local contexts, and, most importantly, ensuring equal access to education. This should prompt education systems across Europe to ask: What is the best approach to achieve this balance?

As the UK Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer advocates for breaking the “class ceiling” through further decentralisation (The Labour Party, 2022:5), Berlin’s educational governance offers a glimpse into the potential future of school communities across Europe if this question isn’t comprehensively answered.

Key Messages

  • Local politicians significantly influence the implementation of national educational policies, affecting school catchment areas and educational success
  • Berlin’s historical district-based structure and school choice policies have led to increased social segregation and competition
  • Differences in policy implementation among district heads are shaped by contextual factors and political beliefs, causing inconsistent educational outcomes
  • Decentralisation in education can lead to fragmented systems and increased inequalities, highlighting the need for balanced central and local governance
Daisy MacRae

Daisy MacRae

Daisy MacRae is a final year MA (Hons) Government, Policy and Society student at the University of Edinburgh.

Other blog posts on similar topics:

References and Further Reading

  • Burgess, S., Greaves, E., &Vignoles, A. (2020). School places: A fair choice. Educational Review.
  • Crawford, M., Maxwell, B., Coldron, J., & Simkins, T. (2020). Local authorities as actors in the emerging “school-led” system in England. Educational Review, 1–17.
  • Dabisch, V. (2022). Which child to which school? How local politicians shape catchment areas, school choice and diversity. European Educational Research Journal, 22(6), 814–833.
  • ‌Dzhurylo, A. (2019). Decentralization in education systems: European policies and practices. Education: Modern Discourses, 1, 29–37.
  • Morrison, N. (2024) Are Lotteries The Fairest Way To Allocate School Places? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2024/01/10/are-lotteries-the-fairest-way-to-allocate-school-places/
  • ‌Nordholm, D., Wermke, W., & Jarl, M. (2022). In the eye of the storm? Mapping out a story of principals’ decision-making in an era of decentralisation and re-centralisation. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 1–21.
  • The Labour Party: Policy Positions on Key Education Issues. (2022). https://plmr.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Labour-Party-Policy-Positions_Education_Dec2022web.pdf
  • United Nations. (2018). What is the goal here? Why does education matter? https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Goal-4.pdf
Parental and Family Involvement in Children’s Digital Learning: Bridging Policy and Practice

Parental and Family Involvement in Children’s Digital Learning: Bridging Policy and Practice

by | ESAI, NW 14 Communities, Families, and Schooling in Educational Research

As education systems adapt to the demands of the digital age, preparing students to live and learn in a technology driven world has become a pressing priority. The successful integration of digital technologies in education is a complex, multi-faceted process that depends on several interrelated factors, including the crucial role of family support and socio-economic conditions (Giannoutsou et al., 2024). This blog briefly explores how European and Irish digital education policies seek to address parental and family involvement in children’s digital learning—a topic we believe deserves greater recognition. We aim to spark discussions about how education systems and school communities can better support families, especially those at risk of digital exclusion. We will conclude with proffering recommendations for bridging gaps in policy and practice to foster inclusive digital learning environments.

Parental involvement in children’s learning: why it matters?

A large body of research highlights the benefits of parental involvement on children’s development, both socially and academically.  Whether at home, in school, or both, the more parents actively engage in their child’s education, the better the outcomes.  But what exactly is parental involvement in an educational context? Literature describes it as a ‘multi-faceted’ (Epstein, 1995) and ‘multi-dimensional’ concept (Laranjeiro et al.,2023). As a general definition, parental involvement refers to parents actively engaging in their child’s education both at school and at home. Several seminal publications provide frameworks for understanding the concept of parental involvement, including the Parental Involvement Process model (Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler, 1995, 1997) and Epstein’s six types of parental involvement (1995). These frameworks enable us to understand why and how parents become involved in their child’s education.

As education systems and schools work towards integrating digital technologies into education successfully, these theoretical perspectives clearly elucidate the central role parents play. By recognising this role, we can work toward building stronger family-school partnerships in the digital age with the ultimate aim of achieving better outcomes for children.

Policy – the role of parents and families in digital education

The digital transformation of education, defined as “a realignment of education models utilising digital technology to engage students, teachers, parents, and leaders more effectively at every point in the students’ schooling journey” (McCarthy et al., 2023, p. 9), has seen education systems across the globe develop strategies and policies to guide the integration and use of digital technologies in schools (van der Flies, 2020). Yet, parental involvement in digital education is often overlooked in such policies (Internetmatters.org, 2024), despite research highlighting that strong school-parent relationships are integral to the digital transformation process (Giannoutsou et al., 2024).

Some recent development suggests a more optimistic outlook. At EU level, a 2023 European Council recommendation called for the “active participation” of parents and other underrepresented groups in digital education reforms. At national level, Ireland’s Digital Strategy for Schools to 2027 emphasises empowering parents to support children’s digital learning, acknowledging gaps in adult digital skills. Similarly, Ireland’s Literacy, Numeracy, and Digital Literacy Strategy 2024–2033 aims to expand family digital literacy programmes, particularly for marginalised communities.

Enacting these policies and strategies at school level requires the engagement of key actors, particularly school leaders and teachers (McCarthy et al., 2023). By promoting parental involvement in children’s digital learning, they play a key role in fostering stronger family-school partnerships, which work towards enhancing student outcomes (Yulianti et al., 2022). However, with school leaders and teachers already managing numerous policies and initiatives, implementing additional actions to support digital education policies requires substantial investment in both physical and human resources in our educations systems.

What does this look like in practice? Some examples of digital resources and programmes

Building on the understanding of parental involvement as active engagement in children’s education both at home and in school, here are some Irish initiatives and resources designed to support family-school partnerships in the digital age:

  • Programme to Enhance Digital Literacy (PEDL): This school-based programme in Ireland is designed to support and shape parents’ digital confidence and competence, enabling them to better support their children’s digital learning. Read more about the programme here.
  • European Year of Digital Citizenship Education (2025): Hosted by the Council of Europe, this initiative offers tools and ideas to help parents and carers support their children in becoming ethical individuals who can actively participate in online and offline communities. You can access the resources for parents here.
  • Digital Wellbeing Resources: Many available resources for parents focus on supporting aspects of their children’s digital wellbeing, such as internet safety. Two notable examples from Ireland include Webwise Guides for Parents, which addresses issues like cyberbullying and online safety, and Barnardo’s Parent Section, offering practical guidance to foster safe digital environments at home.

These links offer a brief insight into some of the materials available to schools which could be used to foster parental involvement in children’s digital education. For maximum impact, we recommend complementing these resources with training for members of the school community to provide in-person sessions, which facilitate direct engagement and stronger connections between parents and schools. Furthermore, we echo Gonzalez-DeHass et al. (2022) in highlighting the need for further research into meaningful home-based digital learning practices, as well as the development of tailored resources specifically aimed at shaping parents’ competence in using digital learning tools and platforms for education.

Recommendations

To support parental involvement in children’s digital learning, we propose the following actions:

Allocate a Dedicated Parent and Family Support Position in Schools:

Providing dedicated staff to support parents can strengthen family-school relationships. In Ireland, the Home School Community Liaison Officer (HSCLO) role is designed to support parents of students at risk of educational disadvantage. While this position is currently limited to schools with DEIS (disadvantaged) status, its benefits could extend to all schools, fostering greater parental involvement and support across diverse educational contexts. An OECD review (2024) highlighted that even non-DEIS schools see the HSCLO role as a valuable asset. Expanding this position to all schools, with a focus on families at risk of digital exclusion, could significantly enhance parental involvement.

Implement School-Based Interventions to Enhance Parents’ Digital Self-Efficacy:

Low levels of digital self-efficacy hinder parents’ ability and motivation to engage with their children’s digital learning (Gonzalez-DeHass et al., 2022). With adequate training and resources, schools can support the implementation of targeted, in-person interventions to build parents’ digital skills and competences. Such programmes would not only foster stronger family-school relationships but also increase parental involvement in digital learning. To ensure success, school leaders should follow established frameworks, such as those outlined by Qualter (2024). However, for such interventions to be successful, they must be adequately resourced by education systems. This includes providing funding, training, and support for schools to design and deliver these programmes effectively. Without this systemic backing, school leaders and teachers—already stretched by existing demands – will naturally face challenges in implementing these initiatives

Key Messages

  • Parental involvement plays a central role in children’s educational outcomes.
  • Building meaningful, collaborative family-school partnerships is essential for creating inclusive approaches to digital education and mitigating digital exclusion.
  • Parental involvement is increasingly recognised in digital education policies as a key factor in addressing digital exclusion, but more actionable steps are needed to turn this recognition into practice.
  • Expanding the Home School Community Liaison Officer (HSCLO) programme, or similar roles, to all schools – regardless of status – can strengthen family-school relationships and provide targeted support for families at risk of many forms of exclusion, including digital.
  • School-based interventions designed to enhance parents’ digital self-efficacy can increase their engagement in children’s digital learning and foster more inclusive educational environments.
  • Schools must be equipped with adequate human, physical, and digital resources, alongside comprehensive training, to effectively involve families in digital learning and ensure all students benefit from the opportunities of the digital age.
  • Successful policy implementation depends on adequate resourcing (see point above). Without this, overburdened school leaders and teachers may struggle to deliver the intended impact of digital transformation initiatives.
Declan Qualter

Declan Qualter

Practice Placement Supervisor, University College Dublin, School of Education

Declan Qualter works in the School of Education at University College Dublin, Ireland, where he is the Practice Placement Supervisor for the UCD Bachelor of Education with Gaeilge and/or Modern Languages programme, and he also teaches on the UCD Professional Masters in Education programme. In addition, Declan is a PhD candidate at the UCD School of Education, where his research focuses on parental involvement in children’s home-based digital learning. His other research interests are focused on the digital transformation of education, particularly the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational settings.

Linked in – https://www.linkedin.com/in/declanqualter/

Orcid – https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4872-0343

Research gate – https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Declan-Qualter 

Dr Rachel Farrell

Dr Rachel Farrell

Assistant Professor, University College Dublin, School of Education

Dr Rachel Farrell is Assistant Professor of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) and the Director of the Professional Master of Education Programme (PME) in the School of Education at University College Dublin. Rachel’s main research interest is in the area of Democratic Pedagogical Partnerships and Expansive Learning in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Rachel has led many collaborative initiatives including: effective use of immersive technology in post-primary education with SchooVR, an evaluation of digital portfolios in ITE with MS Education Ireland, cyber resilience education with the Department of the Environment Climate and Communications (DECC) – see www.cyberwise.ie, The Look See What I Can Be: Changing Mindsets/Impacting Futures in STEM funded by SFI and supported by the Professional Development Services for Teachers (PDST), SFI funded Science Week initiative in 2021 and the PDST Young Economist of the Year national awards for post-primary students in association with multiple universities and government agencies.

X – @econrachel

LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/in/rachel-farrell-phd-ucd/

Ordid – https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-7938 

Other blog posts on similar topics:

References and Further Reading

Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children We Share. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20405436

Giannoutsou, N., Ioannou, A., Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Cachia, R., Villagrá-, S. S., & Martínez-, M. A. (2024, January 29). Unpacking the impact of digital technologies in Education. JRC Publications Repository. https://doi.org/10.2760/214675

Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., Powers, J. R., & Musgrove, A. T. (2022). Parental involvement in supporting students’ digital learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2129647

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97(2), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700202

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170618

Internetmatters.org (2024, September 6). Children’s Wellbeing in a Digital World — Index Report 2024. Internet Matters. https://www.internetmatters.org/hub/research/childrens-wellbeing-in-a-digital-world-index-report-2024/#full-report

Laranjeiro, D., Antunes, M. J., & Santos, P. (2023). Using Design-Based Research for a Technological Intervention to Promote Parental Involvement in Kindergarten. SN Computer Science, 4(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01666-8

McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479

OECD. (2024). OECD Review of Resourcing Schools to Address Educational Disadvantage in Ireland. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/3433784c-en

Qualter, D. (2024). From Digital Exclusion to Digital Inclusion: Shaping the Role of Parental Involvement in Home-Based Digital Learning – A Narrative Literature Review. Computers in the Schools, 41(2), 120–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2322167

van der Flies, R. (2020). Digital strategies in education across OECD countries: Exploring education policies on digital technologies. OECD Education Working Papers, Vol. 226. https://doi.org/10.1787/33dd4c26-en

Yulianti, K., Denessen, E., Droop, M., & Veerman, G.-J. (2022). School efforts to promote parental involvement: The contributions of school leaders and teachers. Educational Studies, 48(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740978

Math meditation – how mindfulness transforms anxiety into numbers

Math meditation – how mindfulness transforms anxiety into numbers

by | NW 24 Mathematics Education Research

Even though mathematics is often considered the queen of sciences and one of the most important subjects taught in school, it remains a mystery to many people and is associated with fear—often passed down to children by parents, guardians, teachers, and social and cultural influences. Many educators, who play a crucial role in nurturing talents and supporting the development of mathematical skills, may benefit from additional training and resources on this topic.

The myth of mathematical talent as an innate gift

The belief that mathematical talent is both rare and inherited is a widespread cultural myth. Many still assume that success in mathematics requires a special, innate “gift” that cannot be learned or developed through effort alone. Research has shown that people often associate math achievement with brilliance, and this perceived brilliance is commonly thought to be genetically determined. For instance, surveys of both academics and the general public reveal a tendency to view math as a subject where innate talent plays a larger role than effort or teaching. (E. Chestnut, R. Ley, S. Leslie, A. Cimpian 2018; Science Daily, 2020).

Genetic studies suggest some link between brain development and mathematical ability, though the extent of the influence of heredity remains complex. For example, research on the neurobiological origins of mathematical ability highlights how certain genetic factors affect brain structures associated with quantity processing, influencing mathematical skills in children​ (M. Skeide et. Al, 2020).

This view, however, has important social implications, as it perpetuates stereotypes that brilliance—and thus success in mathematics—is more common among certain groups (such as males or people of specific racial backgrounds) while discouraging others from pursuing math-intensive fields ​(E. Chestnut, R. Ley, S. Leslie, A. Cimpian, 2018).

In my homeland, Poland, we recognize a great need to change the way mathematics is taught, starting from the earliest educational stages (StrefaEdukacji 2024). Unfortunately, this cannot happen immediately. It requires a lot of time, effort, and willingness to meet such a difficult challenge.

Could mindfulness help alleviate maths anxiety?

My academic interests are related to early childhood education in mathematics and language. During my work in primary schools, with students, and while conducting research projects, I noticed that the fear that often accompanies mathematics can be mitigated. Completing a psychotherapy course and having my own experiences with mindfulness led me to realize that this could be an important point in alleviating mathematical anxiety. As it later turned out, I was not the only one who thought this way.

The United Kingdom was one of the first countries to widely introduce mindfulness into schools. Mindfulness programs began to be implemented on a larger scale in 2019 as part of an initiative aimed at improving students’ mental health. This project, carried out by the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families in collaboration with University College London, involved around 370 schools in England. As part of the initiative, students participated in mindfulness exercises, relaxation techniques, and breathing exercises to improve their mental well-being (Chen, C. ,2021,Weare, K., & Bethune, A.,2021).

Research on the impact of mindfulness on mathematics performance in schools has yielded promising results. One study conducted on primary school students in the United Kingdom found that mindfulness interventions can help reduce mathematics anxiety, which in turn can improve mathematics performance. Students who regularly practiced mindfulness before math lessons reported lower levels of anxiety and better results in math tests. However, the effectiveness of these interventions varied depending on the school and its approach to implementing the program (Henderson, D., 2019)​.

Other studies on secondary school students indicate a positive impact of mindfulness on high-stakes mathematics test performance. Specifically, students who participated in mindfulness sessions before tests achieved better results than their peers who did not have such an intervention. Mindfulness helped them reduce stress and anxiety related to testing, which positively influenced their achievements (Zuo, H., & Wang, L. (2023)).

It is worth noting, however, that although research indicates the benefits of mindfulness in mathematics education, the effectiveness of these programs can depend on various factors, such as the implementation method and individual differences among students. Therefore, further research is necessary to better understand how and why mindfulness affects mathematics performance (Meyer, L., & Eklund, K. (2020).

Traditional Teaching of Mathematics

Mathematics is often taught in a highly structured way, prioritizing memorization and practice of specific techniques. This conventional method is teacher-centered and results-driven, emphasizing accuracy and speed. Many students experience math anxiety due to the pressure of getting correct answers quickly, which can make learning rigid and stressful. Mistakes are typically viewed as failures rather than opportunities for learning, contributing to a fear-based relationship with the subject​. (Boaler, J., 2016).

Traditional math teaching often emphasizes heavy focus on formulas and algorithms, requiring students to memorize and apply them in repetitive ways. This approach places a strong emphasis on performance, especially through tests and exams, where students are judged primarily on their ability to get the right answer quickly. Instruction tends to be teacher-centered, allowing little room for exploration or curiosity, as students follow strict procedures rather than engaging in creative problem-solving. Mistakes are often seen as failures rather than opportunities for growth, which can lead to increased anxiety among students. As a result, this method of teaching tends to disconnect learners from emotional or mindful engagement, reducing their ability to connect with the material on a deeper level.

Teaching Mathematics with Mindfulness

In teaching mathematics with mindfulness, there is a strong encouragement of self-reflection and mindfulness exercises aimed at reducing student anxiety. Mistakes are normalized, promoting a learning process that embraces trial and error rather than fear of failure. The focus shifts from memorizing formulas to understanding concepts deeply, ensuring that students grasp the “why” behind the methods they use. Real-world applications of math concepts are highlighted to make the subject more engaging and relevant. Additionally, collaborative learning environments are fostered, supporting cooperative problem-solving and peer interaction, which enhances both understanding and enjoyment of the subject (Leppma, M., & Darrah, M., 2022).

Studies suggest that incorporating mindfulness practices in math classrooms can significantly reduce anxiety and improve problem-solving skills by helping students focus on the present moment and engage with math in a more open, less judgmental way (Ahmed, K., Trager, B., Rodwell, M., Foinding, L., & Lopez, C., 2017).). This approach aligns well with contemporary educational goals that prioritize not just cognitive, but emotional and social development.

Summary – and a call for change in teaching mathematics in Poland

In my opinion, considering the needs of Polish children, we should implement similar initiatives in our country. The experiences in the United Kingdom clearly demonstrate that mindfulness in education can help students. Introducing mindfulness programs in schools, especially amidst the current mental health crisis among children and adolescents, can serve as a powerful tool for fostering mental health hygiene and prevention.

By adopting these practices, we can help Polish youth not only academically but also develop the resilience and well-being needed to thrive in all aspects of their lives. And as mindfulness has no cultural boundaries, such assistance should, in my opinion, be a right for every student attending school in every country in our world.

Key Messages

  • Mindfulness reduces math anxiety by shifting focus to the present moment.
  • Embracing mistakes as part of the learning process improves problem-solving skills.
  • Mindful approaches foster a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts.
  • Mindfulness improves concentration, leading to better performance in math.
  • Math meditation enhances emotional and cognitive development.
Dr Maja Wenderlich

Dr Maja Wenderlich

Assistant Professor in the Department of Supporting Human Development and Education, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland

Other blog posts on similar topics:

References and Further Reading

Ahmed, K., Trager, B., Rodwell, M., Foinding, L., & Lopez, C. (2017). A review of mindfulness research related to alleviating math and science anxiety. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 16(2), 26–30. https://spiral.lynn.edu/facpubs/434/

Bennett, D. (2019). Mindfulness and math: The role of mindfulness in mathematics education and assessment. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0078-1 

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ernest, P. (1989). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, England: Falmer Press. 2016-07883-000 

Chen, C. (2021). Exploring mindfulness-based school programs around the world. Centre for Education Improvement. https://www.edimprovement.org/post/exploring-mindfulness-based-school-programs-around-the-world

Chestnut,  E., Ley, R., Leslie, S., Cimpian, A. (2018). The Myth That Only Brilliant People Are Good at Math and Its Implications for Diversity. Education sciences, 8(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020065

Henderson, D. (2019). Exploring the impact of a mindfulness-based intervention in relation to primary school children’s mathematics anxiety [Doctorate of Educational Psychology in Educational Child and Community Psychology]. University of Exeter. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/38965

Leppma, M., & Darrah, M. (2022). Self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion as predictors of math anxiety in undergraduate students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–16. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10327283-self-efficacy-mindfulness-self-compassion-predictors-math-anxiety-undergraduate-students 

Meyer, L., & Eklund, K. (2020). The impact of a mindfulness intervention on elementary classroom climate and student and teacher mindfulness: A pilot study. Mindfulness, 11, 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01317-6

Neuroscience News. (2020, October 28). Genetics linked to children’s math ability. Neuroscience News. https://neurosciencenews.com/genetics-math-ability-17207/

Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Piñeiro, I., Estévez, I., & Valle, A. (2020). Gender differences in mathematics motivation: Differential effects on performance in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03050

ScienceDaily. (2020, October 22). Mindfulness training in schools reduces stress and improves mental health. ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201022144549.htm

StrefaEdukacji. (2023, September 4). Wiceminister edukacji Katarzyna Lubnauer zapowiada zmiany w nauczaniu matematyki. Strefa Edukacji. https://strefaedukacji.pl/wiceminister-edukacji-katarzyna-lubnauer-zapowiada-zmiany-w-nauczaniu-matematyki-szkoly-czeka-kolejna-rewolucja/ar/c5-18385069

Weare, K., & Bethune, A. (2021). Implementing mindfulness in schools: An evidence-based guide. The Mindfulness Initiative. https://mindfulnessinschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/implementingmindfulnessinschools-vfinal-digital.pdf#:~:text=URL%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fmindfulnessinschools.org%2Fwp

Zuo, H., & Wang, L. (2023). The influences of mindfulness on high-stakes mathematics test achievement of middle school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061027/full

EduTopics: ECER – A WebApp for exploring ECER contributions since 1998

EduTopics: ECER – A WebApp for exploring ECER contributions since 1998

by | NW 12 LISnet - Library and Information Science Network

30 years of EERA means 30 years of ECER conferences. 30 years of discussions. 30 years of inspiring new research ideas, setting trends but also reflecting and adapting to paradigm shifts in terms of educational issues and methodological advancements. This momentous occasion is not only an anniversary to be celebrated and should be a point of retro- and introspection, but also of tone and theme setting for the future of educational research. After all, ECER is and always has been one of the central yearly occasions to reflect on one’s own work and determine potential future avenues of research. But as George Santayana once (allegedly) said: “To know your future, you must know your past.”

Which is easier said than done, when one glance at the sheer number of networks, authors and their contributions at ECER shows the vastness of educational research and investigated topics over the years and its heterogeneity. This vastness and heterogeneity are not only challenges to be overcome, but also a resource to be harnessed to identify past, current and potentially future trends in educational research. And this is exactly where EduTopics: ECER comes into play – the project on which this post is based.

Enabling users to explore past and present ECER contributions

Figure 1. Screenshot of the interactive plot on the development of contributions to ECER from 1998 to 2024 differentiated for ECER networks.

The main goal of EduTopics:ECER was to enable interested users to explore the corpus of contributions to the past (and present) ECER conferences. As gaining an overview of over 30,000 contributions in over 30 networks (see Figure 1) from thousands of authors is no small feat, we applied natural language processing, machine learning and clustering procedures to analyze and cluster the corpus. Procedures from those methodological areas were utilized to analyze the number of contributions related to the various ECER networks, authors, affiliation countries or years, and to determine the central topics of research across the years. For this purpose, we used topic modelling to determine the most frequent research topics across over 30,000 contributions and over 30 networks (see the methods section of the app for a detailed explanation and further references on topic modelling). 

On the one hand, the topic modelling process resulted in topics clearly associated with singular networks, such as topics on “history of education”, “vocational education”, or “teacher education”; on the other hand, cross-cutting topics relevant to a multitude of ECER networks were also identified, such as “transitions and decisions (in education)”, “emotions, motivation and self-efficacy” or methodological topics such as “ethnographic studies” or “reviews and bibliometrics”.

Figure 2. Screenshot of the interactive plot on the topic-relevancy over the years from 1998 to 2024 for the topic “Quantitative Scales and Questionnaires“
Figure 2. Screenshot of the interactive plot on the topic-relevancy over the years from 1998 to 2024 for the topic “Quantitative Scales and Questionnaires“
Figure 3. Screenshot of the interactive plot on the top 5 EERA networks for the topic “Quantitative Scales and Questionnaires“ from 1998 to 2024
Figure 3. Screenshot of the interactive plot on the top 5 ECER networks for the topic “Quantitative Scales and Questionnaires“ from 1998 to 2024

Users can explore the topics, their main authors, central contributions and yearly trends (see Figure 2), and explore the relevancy of the topics for each single author (with at least n = 5 contributions to ECER) or ECER network (see Figure 3). As simple lists of words, documents, authors and years may be happiness-inducing to some (us included) – they may not have the same effect on all. Therefore, for each variable and variable intersection, interactive visualizations were added to the app. Users can filter, zoom or even download the figures provided in the app. For those figures, we adapted “modern” interactive visualization techniques such as graph-drawings (see Figure 4) or 2D and 3D-mapping-scatterplots (see Figure 5) of the topics to enable users to identify the relationships, similarities or dissimilarities between the topics.

Figure 4. Screenshot of the interactive graph-plot of all k = 50 topics and all topic-indicative-terms with a term-topic-weight of at least 1%. The local and global structure of the graph was determined with a force-directed-graph-drawing-algorithm.
Figure 4. Screenshot of the interactive graph-plot of all k = 50 topics and all topic-indicative-terms with a term-topic-weight of at least 1%. The local and global structure of the graph was determined with a force-directed-graph-drawing-algorithm.
Figure 5. Screenshot of the interactive three-dimensional t-SNE-cluster-plot for the top n = 200 contributions of the topics “Gender and Gender Differences”, “History of Education” and “Philosophy of Education”.
Figure 5. Screenshot of the interactive three-dimensional t-SNE-cluster-plot for the top n = 200 contributions of the topics “Gender and Gender Differences”, “History of Education” and “Philosophy of Education”.

Furthermore, the app includes a section which enables the users to export samples at the intersection of ECER networks, topics and year of publication. If, for example, a user happens to be interested in contributions from the network “Sports Pedagogy” on the topic “Digitalisation and ICT” from 1998 to 2024, three simple clicks show all contributions related to this input (see Figure 6), and one more click leads to the download of the list of contributions.

Figure 6. Screenshot of an example for the export-function for the intersection of EERA network “18 – Sports Pedagogy” and the topic “Digitalisation and ICT” for 1998 to 2024. The resulting table shows all contributions for the selected settings, including their hyperlink to the ECER database of abstracts.
Figure 6. Screenshot of an example for the export-function for the intersection of ECER network “18 – Sports Pedagogy” and the topic “Digitalisation and ICT” for 1998 to 2024. The resulting table shows all contributions for the selected settings, including their hyperlink to the ECER database of abstracts.

The final interactive feature of the app allows users to insert any text into an input field. With one click, the text is mapped in relation to the corpus, resulting in the topics with the highest relevancy to the mapped text, as well as the most likely associated ECER networks and most similar contributions of the past ECER conferences to the entered text (which can be downloaded with one click, see Figure 7).

Figure 7. Screenshot of the app section on mapping individually entered texts. The text-example is the abstract from Christ, Penthin & Kröner (2021). The plots display the most likely topics and EERA networks of the entered text. The table displays the ECER contributions with the highest similarity to the entered text based on the lowest total euclidean distance between the document-topic-probabilities of the entered text and all ECER contributions.
Figure 7. Screenshot of the app section on mapping individually entered texts. The text-example is the abstract from Christ, Penthin & Kröner (2021). The plots display the most likely topics and ECER networks of the entered text. The table displays the ECER contributions with the highest similarity to the entered text based on the lowest total euclidean distance between the document-topic-probabilities of the entered text and all ECER contributions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this post presents a free tool for the exploration of the contributions to ECER from 1998 to 2024. It serves multiple purposes, as it may be used for creating plots and figures for publications, for answering research questions – for example on the cooperation between authors at ECER – or just for some light-hearted and fun exploration and discovery.

If you use the tool for your own research, we would be happy to link and mention your publications in a section of the app currently under development. We want to invite and encourage you to use the app to your heart’s content to explore the past ECER conferences, to look at the topics and your networks or to look up yourself, including which topics were assigned to your contributions.

We are happy to hear your thoughts about the app’s functions and its design and even, perhaps, about unexpected and surprising results and findings you encounter while using it. As an EERA-funded network seed project, EduTopics:ECER will be updated with next year’s contributions as well as new functions.

As a final note, we hope we could satisfy your curiosity, and give you a little bit of insight into the potentials and boundaries of natural language processing and machine learning for your own research.

Key Messages

  • EduTopics: ECER enables users to explore the contributions to past and present ECERs
  • Over 30,000 contributions from more than 30 networks are searchable due to natural language processing, machine learning and clustering procedures. 
  • In the EduTopics: ECER app, the central k = 50 themes of ECER contributions from 1998 to 2024 have been identified
  • Key insights can be gained by intersecting the k = 50 themes with covariates such as EERA networks or authors
  • All results and visualizations are interactive and free to use.
Dr Alexander Christ

Dr Alexander Christ

DIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education

Alexander Christ works at the DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education as a researcher on the application of machine learning, natural language processing and quantitative (big data) methods for the analyses of large literature corpora. His work focusses on developing and providing statistical code and interactive tools designed that open up new perspectives on and new avenues for research processes as well as empower their users.

Jens Röschlein

Jens Röschlein

DIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education”

Jens Röschlein works at the DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education for the German Education Portal and the German Education Server.

Christoph Schindler

Christoph Schindler

Deputy Head, Information Center Education, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education

Christoph Schindler is Link Convenor (NW 12 “Open Research in Education”), deputy head of the department “Information Center Education” (IZB) at the DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education and team leader (“Literature Information System”).

His team operates the German Education Portal, the German Education Index and the Open Access repository peDOCS. His interests are open science (open research information, open access), infrastructure design, graph technologies and science and technology studies.

Other blog posts on similar topics: