NW 33 Gender and Education Archives

How theory matters in feminist posthumanist new materialist research

by Taylor, Fairchild, Zarabadi and Moxnes | NW 13 Philosophy of Education, NW 33 Gender and Education

We are four researchers at various career stages who share an interest in how feminist posthumanist new materialisms (FPNM) matters in our research, pedagogy and lives. This blog explores what FPNM theory offers educational researchers and gives examples how we have employed this in our research.

I came to theory desperate … to comprehend- to grasp what was happening around and within me

bell hooks

Teaching to Transgress - Education as the Practice of Freedom

Feminist posthumanist new materialist theory

Educational researchers and doctoral students are expected to have and/or use a conceptual or theoretical framework. From a FPNM perspective, this presumption presents some concerns: one, concepts and theories are not pre-existing things, ‘out there’, waiting for us to ‘apply’ them to a pre-existing question or problem; and two, it tends to hide how frameworks shape, define and mould research and researchers in particular ways. However, some researchers have worked with theory as a means to disrupt and defamiliarize dominant practices and categories (Ball, 1995; Lather & Smithies, 1997; Cannella, 1997; Butler, 1990/2006). In FPNM research, theory is an emergent material, practical, political, and relational practice entailing a socially engaged and situated mode of producing knowledge (Coole & Frost, 2010). Taking inspiration from the philosophy of immanence in which concepts are ‘invented’ and continually ‘created anew’ (Deleuze & Guattari, 1994), from posthumanist work which emphasizes the pluralization of ontology beyond the human (Braidotti, 2019; Bennett, 2016), from post-species work (Haraway, 2016), and from reconceptualizations of theory as a material-discursive practice (Barad, 2007; Jackson & Mazzei, 2012), FPNM puts theory to work as a move against human-centric objective mastery. In FPNM, theory is an emergent, embodied, processual practice of knowledge-ing (Taylor, 2021) where theory always materializes in entangled acts of living-researching-becoming.

Working with theory; Living theory

Ahmed (2017) sees theory as doing more the closer it gets to the skin. FPNM theories have the potential to intersect with work in Black Studies (Sharpe 2016, McKittrick 2021), feminist Latina studies (Morega & Anzaldúa, 2021) and Indigenous and decolonising methodologies (Tuhiwai Smith, 2021). In these intersections, theory and practice intertwine with stories of land, body, pain and hope, where the materiality of theory lives in the flesh connecting past, present, futures. Thinking with Multiverse and Pluriverse suggests a range of possible realities exist simultaneously rejecting the notions of fixity and universality (Fairchild, 2023). Therefore, FPNM enhances our capacities to theory’s intimate entanglement with materiality; living FPNM theory highlights the multiplicities of the here-and-now, the past-present and the yet-to-come, encouraging researchers to consider how power and boundaries are constituted and how we may re-imagine different ways of mattering. Living theory is an ethico-onto-epistemological commitment in FPNM research, it informs and is immanent to everything we do, prompting us to question: ‘Who has the power to bring/use/talk about theory’, ‘What theory might become and do after white western humanism?’ ‘How might theory move to attend to new modes of living, doing and knowing?’

Shiva: Materialising the lived experiences of racial harassment

Lived theory in my forthcoming article emerged with hair/her stories of British-Bangladeshi Muslim schoolgirls of my research (Zarabadi, forthcoming 2024). In this article, I focus on the assemblages that hair affectively enables or constrains and the new and different relations that hair produces. I explore material moments when boundaries between human and more-than-human bodies, stories and experiences fade and ‘hairy assemblages’ of pain, injustice, resistance and hope emerged. With posthumanising hair and hair/her stories, I think with hair as lived theory and method, not only to matter with what matters for Muslim schoolgirls, but also to relocate the analytical frame of thinking and researching educational environments and practices towards multiple and untracked material experiences (Zarabadi 2022). Hair as affective agential actants in life stories of Muslim schoolgirls can enable or constrain their bodies and everyday educational embodied and embedded lived experiences into different ‘racialising assemblages’ (Weheliye, 2014). Entangling with hair/her stories as lived theory is a response to Hartman’s call “to tell a story capable of engaging and countering the violence of abstraction” (2008, p. 7).

Anna: Reading, thinking, doing, articulating theory

“Overwhelmingly, theory is bodily, and theory is literal. Theory is not about matters distant from the lived body; quite the opposite”, writes Haraway (2004, p. 68). A particular day in my teaching career awakened awareness for how bodily theories can be. When doing theories in teaching, we, student-teachers and myself, were reading and discussing materiality. Nyhus (2013) writes about how much time young children spend tied up in chairs, waiting. To challenge the student teachers’ relations to theories about materiality, I fastened the bodies of the student-teachers loosely to their chairs with ropes. Before fastening each one, I asked for permission. Those who were not attached volunteered to help untangle their fellow students, if needed. With the student-teachers consent to remain sitting tied in this way, unable to touch each other and their things, I continued with a short lecture. Our bodily affects and reactions created many discussions about ethics and professional practice, and became something the student-teachers referred to when discussing other theoretical aspects regarding practices with young children later on. Both bodies and language is “the effect of articulation” (Haraway, 2004, p. 105), and through the session theory became articulated bodily.

Nikki: The spaces of theory

Space as living theory requires an attention to materiality and time; space is created and modified by techniques, material objects, historical happenings, and social production (Santos, 2021). Living theories call for educators to be aware of their role in the constant transformation of space and how techniques materialise the political nature of learning. Pedagogies of mattering in higher education open up spaces of possibility for students to co-construct reading lists and lecture content and support the redesign of curriculum and assessment. Paying attention to classroom environments considers how power materialises in/as inclusion or exclusion (Gravett et al., 2021; Fairchild et al., 2024). Taking students on field trips can help them understand the challenges of accessing outdoor environments and support them to connect this to their developing education practices (Fairchild, 2021). These examples focus on the power of spaces and how attention to materiality produces new possibilities for thinking otherwise. Space, place and time are contingent and pedagogical, opening up opportunities for students/educators to create their own praxis.

Carol: Living theory with objects-bodies-spaces

Thing theory (Bennett, 2010) enacts the ontological presumption that things are not inert, dead and passive but are ‘vibrant matter’ with agentic capacities. Things’ liveliness produces actions, affects and interventions, and things also act in congregation with other objects, humans, animals, atmospheres, the weather etc. Focusing on things in classrooms brings to the fore the material agency of mundane, everyday objects’ and how their entanglement in educational practices produces inequalities, exclusions and differential matterings. For example, I analysed gender and power via the liveliness of a chair, a pen, a whiteboard and a T-shirt (Taylor, 2013), classroom exclusions and tables (Taylor, 2017), and bags and string to reconceptualize participation and feminist praxis in research (Taylor et al., 2019; Taylor 2022a). Recently, I have developed ‘posthuman object pedagogies’ as a research practice of ‘thinking with things as a means of thinking with theory’ (Taylor et al., 2022b, p. 206), and used arts-based approaches to consider what doors do as barriers and enablers in educational spaces (Taylor et al., 2023).

Living theory for better futures

A passionate question animates how we four work with, and embody, the living theory of FPNM: ‘What sorts of knowledges and knowledge-making practices in educational research do we need to produce different modes of being-knowing-doing so we can resist anthropocentric modes of research based in extractivism and exploitation?’ Living FPNM theory is concerned with ways to live, think, research, work, and care in relation with other human-nonhuman bodies, things, environments, and planetary systems. Living FPNM theory is a research praxis aimed at producing more curiosity, more attentiveness, more relationality, more kindness: it entangles us materially in human-nonhuman lifeworlds that affects us making us feel something. It changes the way we think, creating a more capacious, inclusive and affirmative sense of what educational research can be and what education can become.

Notes: The figures in this blog have been composed of from images we have used in our work, apart from one of these images which was taken from Vogue Mexico: The Climbing Cholitas, 2019, Directed by Yumna Al-Arashi, https://vimeo.com/367077642 Accessed 1 May 2024.

Key Messages

• To conceptualize theory as an emergent material, practical, political, and relational practice entailing a socially engaged and situated mode of producing knowledge.

• To re-think our ethico-onto-epistemological practices as an embodied mode of living theory emergent in and through response-able acts of living-researching-becoming.

• To consider about how feminist posthumanist new materialist (FPNM) theory enables us to move and attend to new modes of living, doing, teaching, researching and knowing.

• We suggest that working with theory/ living theory changes not only the way we think, but creates a more capacious, inclusive and affirmative sense of what educational research can be and what education can become.

Professor Carol A. Taylor

Professor of Higher Education and Gender in the Department of Education, University of Bath

Professor Carol A. Taylor is Professor of Higher Education and Gender in the Department of Education at the University of Bath where she leads the Reimagining Education for Better Futures research group. Carol’s research focuses on the entangled relations of knowledge, power, gender, space and ethics in higher education and utilizes trans- and interdisciplinary posthumanist and feminist materialist theories and methodologies. Carol co-edited the journal Gender and Education for 7 years (2016-2023), and currently serves on the Editorial Boards of Teaching in Higher Education, Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning and Journal of Posthumanism. Her latest books are J. B. Ulmer, C. Hughes, M. Salazar Pérez & C. A. Taylor (Eds.). (2024) The Routledge International Handbook of Transdisciplinary Feminist Research and Methodological Praxis; Fairchild, N., Taylor, C.A., Benozzo, A., Carey, N., Koro, M., & Elmenhorst, C. (2022). Knowledge Production in Material Spaces: Disturbing Conferences and Composing Events. London: Routledge; and Taylor, C. A. and Bayley, A. (Eds.) (2019) Posthumanism and Higher Education: Reimagining Pedagogy, Practice and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dr Nikki Fairchild

Associate Professor in Creative Methodologies and Education at the School of Education, Languages and Linguistics, University of Portsmouth.

Dr Nikki Fairchild is an Associate Professor in Creative Methodologies and Education at the School of Education, Languages and Linguistics, University of Portsmouth. Her research is theoretically informed by critical feminist materialist, posthumanist, and agential realist theory. She employs creative methodologies to disturb knowledge production and relationality by entangling materiality, gender, place-spaces, time, temporality and (early) childhoods. She is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Posthumanism and on the Editorial Boards of Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, Norland Educate Research Journal, and Gender and Education. Her latest book is Fairchild, N., Taylor, C.A., Benozzo, A., Carey, N., Koro, M., & Elmenhorst, C. (2022). Knowledge Production in Material Spaces: Disturbing Conferences and Composing Events. Routledge.

Dr Anna Moxnes

Associate Professor, Department of Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE), University of South-Eastern Norway

Anna Rigmor Moxnes, PhD, is Associate Professor at the department of Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE), University of South-Eastern Norway and works as educator in pedagogy and mentoring. Her recent research-projects are ‘Children and animals relationships’, ‘Mentoring’ and ‘Teaching slowly’. She is inspired of feminist new materialism and post-human theories.

Her latest book is Moxnes, A.R., Wilhemsen, T., Øvreås, S.,Santan, M.O. & Aslanian T.K. (2022).

Barnehagelærerutdanning i endring – å forske på egen praksis i høyere utdanning.

[Early Childhood Teacher Education in Change - research on own practice in higher education].

Universitetsforlaget.

Dr Shiva Zarabadi

Dr Shiva Zarabadi holds a Ph.D. in Education, Gender, Feminist New Materialism and Posthumanism from UCL Institute of Education. Her research interests include feminist new materialism, posthumanism and intra-actions of matter, time, affect, space, humans and more-than-humans. She uses walking and photo-diary methodologies to map relational materialities in ordinary practices. She is the co-editor of the book Towards Posthumanism in Education: Theoretical Entanglements and Pedagogical Mappings (Routledge) and the author of ‘Bodies of Walking: Trans-Materializing the Experiences of Racial Harassment’ in Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies and ‘Watery assemblages: the affective and material swimming-becomings of a Muslim girl’s queer body with nature’ in Australian Journal of Environmental Education.

References and Further Reading

Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.

Ball. S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or Technicians? The Urgent Role of Theory in Educational Studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255-271. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3121983

Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. London: Duke University Press.

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.

Butler, J. (1990/2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Cannella, G. S. (1997). Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social Justice and Revolution. Peter Lang Publishing.

Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Verso Books.

Fairchild, N. (2021) Pedagogies of place-spaces: walking-with the post-professional, PRACTICE [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2021.1968279

Fairchild, N. (2023). Multiverse, Feminist Materialist Relational Time, and Multiple Future(s): (Re)configuring Possibilities for Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231176753

Fairchild, N., Gravett, K., & Taylor, C. A. (2024). Pedagogies of Mattering in Higher Education: thinking-with posthumanist and feminist materialist theory-praxis. In J. Bustillos Morales & S. Zarabadi (Eds.), Towards Posthumanism in Education: Theoretical Entanglements and Pedagogical Tracings (pp. 123-136). Routledge.

Gravett, K., Taylor, C. A., & Fairchild, N. (2021). Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580

Haraway, D. J. (2004). The Haraway reader. Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Hartman, S. (2008). Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1215/-12-2-1

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching To Transgress (1st ed.). Routledge.

Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. Routledge.

Lather P.A., & Smithies, C. S. (1997). Troubling The Angels: Women Living With HIV/aids. Routledge.

McKittrick, K. (2021). Dear Science and Other Stories. Duke University Press.

Morega, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (2021). This bridge called my back: writings by radical women of color. 40^th anniversary edition. SUNY Press.

Nyhus, M. R. (2013). Ventebølger. Venting og de yngste barnas rom for medvirkning i barnehagen. [Waiting-waves. Waiting and the youngest childrens room for participating in Kindergarten.] Fagbokforlaget.

Santos, M. (2021). The nature of space. Duke University Press.

Sharpe, C. (2016) In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Duke University Press.

Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom, Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864

Taylor, C. A. (2017). Rethinking the empirical in higher education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1256984

Taylor, C. A. (2018). Edu-crafting posthumanist adventures in/for higher education: A speculative musing, Parallax, 24(3), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496585

Taylor, C., Fairchild, N., Elmenhorst, C., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Benozzo, A., & Carey, N. (2019). Improvising Bags Choreographies: Disturbing Normative Ways of Doing Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418767210

Taylor, C. A. (2021). Knowledge matters: Five propositions concerning the reconceptualisation of knowledge in feminist new materialist, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches. In K. Murris (Ed.) Navigating the Postqualitative, New Materialist and Critical Posthumanist Terrain Across Disciplines: An Introductory Guide. Routledge.

Taylor, C. A., Tobias-Green, K., Sexton, J., & Healey, J. (2022a). Regarding string: A theory-method-praxis of/for co-compos(t)ing feminist hope. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology. 13(2), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4910

Taylor, C. A., Hogarth, H., Barratt Hacking, E., & Bastos, E. (2022b). Posthuman Object Pedagogies: Thinking with Things to Think with Theory for Innovative Educational Research, Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry. 14(1), 206–221. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/cpi/index.php/cpi/article/view/29662/21668

Taylor, C. A., Albin-Clarke, J., Broadhurst Healey, K., Hogarth, H., Lewis, Z., Pihkala, S., Smith, S., Cranham, J., Latto, L. (2023). What do doors do? Door storyings, matterings, adventurings and commonings. Qualitative Inquiry[online first]. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231196184

Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd Ed). Zed Books Ltd.

Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press.

Zarabadi, S. (2022). Watery assemblages: The affective and material swimming-becomings of a Muslim girl’s queer body with nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.39

Zarabadi, S. (Forthcoming 2024). ‘Hair-ing and haring: Post (auto) theoretical more-than-human entanglement with hair/her/stories of Muslim schoolgirls’, Gender and Education SI: Gender, Feminisms and the ‘Posts’: Contemporary Contestations, New Educational Imaginaries & Hope-full Renewals.

Gender and attainment in Northern Ireland: How can we understand the division?

by Erin Early | NW 33 Gender and Education

Post-primary attainment is commonly measured through GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) examinations which are completed in the final year of compulsory schooling in the UK at age 16. The GCSE attainment outcomes of pupils are annually reported in Northern Ireland by the Department of Education. They are presented according to school type (grammar schools which select pupils based on their academic ability on an entrance test (also known as the transfer test) or non-grammar schools which are not academically selective in their intake of pupils), socio-economic status (Free School Meal Eligibility) and gender. The gendered division in educational attainment in Northern Ireland continually receives policy attention, most recently from the Expert Panel on Educational Underachievement in Northern Ireland. This leaves the questions: what is the gender attainment divide, and how can we understand it?

What is the gender attainment divide?

Gender is an important determinant of attainment differences across the compulsory education system in the UK. Studies report the consistently higher performance of female pupils compared to males (Adcock et al., 2016; Department for Education, 2020; Cavaglia et al., 2020; Francis and Skelton, 2005; Gorard et al., 2001; Melhuish et al., 2013; Tinklin et al., 2001).

Northern Ireland reflects a similar trend to the rest of the UK, with females achieving higher GCSE attainment than males (Borooah and Knox, 2017; Department of Education, 2019; Gallagher and Smith, 2000; Shuttleworth, 1995). Most recently, in a newly published study we used a dataset in Northern Ireland that linked the 2011 Census with the School Leavers Survey and School Census for the first time.

The study explored how a pupil’s gender, religious affiliation, socio-economic status (measured by mothers’ and fathers’ education qualifications and occupational status, Free School Meal Eligibility, home ownership, property value, and the 2010 Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure for income) and attended school (grammar or non-grammar) influenced their GCSE attainment.

We found that females had higher educational attainment as they achieved higher GCSE scores than males. The gendered effect on GCSE attainment was the joint second greatest effect (with mothers’ education) in our study. Although the gendered division of attainment outcomes is likely to emerge at an earlier stage of the compulsory education system in Northern Ireland, this is not possible to explore as there are no available individual-level attainment data prior to GCSE. Despite this limitation in the Northern Ireland context, an attainment difference according to gender is clear, which leaves the question: how can we understand this gendered divide?

How can we understand the gendered attainment divide?

An interdisciplinary framework consisting of Bourdieu’s theory of practice and Tajfel and Turner’s social identity theorycan help our understanding of the gendered attainment divide.

Bourdieu’s (1986, 1984) writings predominantly focus on social status and how position affects an individual’s ability within the education system. His work on habitus, which can also be described as an individual’s dispositions or character, is relevant to understanding the gendered attainment division. Social identity theory developed by Tajfel and Turner (1979) can also aid our understanding of the gendered division in attainment as it outlines the process an individual is exposed to when forming an identity based on characteristics such as gender.

Habitus refers to an individual’s dispositions or character which organise and affect how they perceive the social world. Habitus reflects a degree of fluidity as it can change according to context, time and the social identity of an individual based on characteristics such as their gender. Habitus is therefore connected to social identity theory in a cyclical process where an individual’s identity influences their habitus, and vice versa.

Tajfel (1972) suggested that social identity was a result of the socialisation process, which provides an individual with the ability to identify with social groups they have a common characteristic with (for example, gender). The social identity process can result in individuals internalising behaviours associated with their gender, which can alter their habitus. This process, coupled with potential gendered socialisation experiences, could heighten habitus differences between males and females in settings such as schools. For example, an individual’s gendered identity and habitus may influence academic attitudes and expectations based on the norms and values of the affiliated social group, all of which can influence educational attainment and lead to a gendered division.

We must acknowledge that the cyclical process between habitus and social identity is not straightforward as more than one male and female social identity exists. For example, studies have reported multiple male social identities (also termed as masculinity) in educational settings (Connolly, 2006, 2004; Lyng, 2009; Travers, 2017). Lyng (2009)identified various masculinity types in schools, such as macho, geek, golden boy, and nerd. It could be argued that each of these identities has a varying influence on an individual’s habitus, which ultimately affects their educational attainment. For example, the identity of macho may have a greater negative influence on educational attainment compared to the identity of geek, which reflects a greater attachment to school. Femininity identities are also important to consider but are under-researched (Lyng, 2009).

Key Messages

A gendered attainment divide remains in Northern Ireland (and the wider UK).
Gender remains a key factor driving educational attainment differences between pupils (Early et al., 2022).
A dual framework of Bourdieu’s theory of practice, more specifically the concept of habitus, and Tajfel and Turner’s social identity theory can help our understanding of why a gendered attainment divide persists.
The social identity process can lead to individuals internalising behaviours associated with their gender, which can alter their habitus and affect their educational attainment outcomes.

References and Further Reading

Adcock, A., Bolton, P. and Abreu, L. (2016). Educational performance of boys. London: House of Commons. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/27199/1/CDP-2016-0151.pdf

Borooah, V.K. and Knox, C. (2017). Inequality, segregation and poor performance: the education system in Northern Ireland. Educational Review, 69(3), pp.318-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1213225

Bourdieu, P. (1986). ‘The forms of capital’, in Richardson, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport: Greenwood, pp. 241-258.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste (translated by Richard Nice). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Calvaglia, C., Machin, S., McNally, S. and Ruiz-Valenzuela, J. (2020). Gender, achievement, and subject choice in English education. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(4), pp.816-835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa050

Connolly, P. (2004). Boys and Schooling in the Early Years. London: Routledge Falmer.

Connolly, P. (2006). The effects of social class and ethnicity on gender differences in GCSE attainment: a secondary analysis of the Youth Cohort Study of England and Wales 1997-2001. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), pp.3-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401963

Department for Education (2020). Key stage 4 performance, 2019 (revised). Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/863815/2019_KS4_revised_text.pdf

Department of Education (2019). Year 12 and Year 14 Examination Performance at Post-Primary Schools in Northern Ireland 2018-19. Available at: https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/education/Revised%20-%20Year%2012%20and%20Year%2014%20Examination%20Performance%20at%20Post%20Primary%20schools%20in%20Northern%20Ireland%202018_19%20_%20Revised.pdf

Early, E., Miller, S., Dunne, L. and Moriarty, J. (2022). The Influence of Socio-Demographics and School Factors on GCSE Attainment: Results from the First Record Linkage Data in Northern Ireland. Oxford Review of Education (forthcoming). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2035340

Francis, B. and Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing Gender and Achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge.

Gallagher, T. and Smith, A. (2000). The effects of the selective system of secondary education in Northern Ireland. Bangor: Department of Education. Available at: https://www.ulster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/223409/2000_The_Effects_Of_The_Selective_System_Of_Secondary_Education_In_Northern_Ireland_Main_Report.pdf

Gorard, S., Rees, G., and Salisbury, J. (2001). Investigating patterns of differential attainment of boys and girls at school. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), pp.125-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120037090

Islam, G. (2014). Social Identity Theory, in Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, (ed. Teo, T.), pp. 1781-1783. New York: Springer. doi: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gazi-Islam-2/publication/281208338_Social_Identity_Theory/links/55db57ec08ae9d6594935f59/Social-Identity-Theory.pdf

Lyng, S.T. (2009). Is there more to “antischoolishness” than masculinity? On multiple student styles, gender and educational self-exclusion in secondary school. Men and Masculinities. 11(4), pp.462-487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06298780

Melhuish, E., Quinn. L., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I. and Taggart, B.(2013). Preschool affects longer term literacy and numeracy: results from a general population longitudinal study in Northern Ireland. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(2), pp.234-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.749796

Power, E.M. (1999). An introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s Key Theoretical Concepts. Journal for the Study of Food and Society. 3(1), pp.48-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.2752/152897999786690753

Shuttleworth, I. (1995) The Relationship between Social Deprivation, as Measured by Individual Free School Meal Eligibility, and Educational Attainment at GCSE in Northern Ireland: a preliminary investigation. British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), pp.487–504. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1501372

Tajfel, H. (1972). ‘Social categorization (English manuscript of ‘La categorisation Sociale’)’, in Moscovici, S. (ed). Introduction à la psychologie sociale (vol. 1). Paris: Larousse, pp. 272-302.

Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1979). ‘An integrative theory of inter-group conflict’, in Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S. (eds.) The social psychology of inter-group relations. Belmont: Wadsworth, pp.33-47.

Tinklin, T., Croxford, L., Ducklin, A. and Frame, B. (2001). Gender and Pupil Performance in Scotland’s Schools. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Available at: https://www.ces.ed.ac.uk/old_site/PDF%20Files/Gender_Report.pdf

Travers, M.C. (2017). White working-class boys: teachers matter. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.

The Promise of Donna Haraway’s Philosophy: Knotting Together Better Educational Futures

by Taylor, Fairchild, Zarabadi and Moxnes | Emerging Researchers' Group, NW 13 Philosophy of Education, NW 33 Gender and Education

As we have grappled with critical questions in our research and teaching, all of us contributing to this blog have been energised by Donna Haraway’s work. This blog explores the promise of Haraway’s philosophy for knowledge, learning and education. Donna Haraway’s philosophy offers conceptual and practical resources for navigating the complexities of contemporary educational problems.

Reconceptualising knowledge, learning and education with Donna Haraway

Haraway’s major early intervention was to challenge traditional notions of objectivity – which she called ‘the God trick’ (Haraway, 1988). She argued that objectivity was a Western masculinist, patriarchal tradition, which presumed researchers could be impartial, observe and produce ‘Truth’. This damaging fallacy has conferred epistemological status on science delegitimizing many other ways of knowing. Haraway opposes ‘the God trick’ with the concept and practice of ‘situated knowledges’ which pose a feminist critique demonstrating that knowledge practices are ‘political’ and that some knowledges have been (illegitimately) disqualified by dominant science. Recognising that all knowledge is located and relies on partial perspectives allows for the inclusion of lived material realities and feelings that shape our educational experiences.

The concept and practice of learning is central to Haraway’s oeuvre. Learning happens in the world, attending to our being-in-relation with the world and other species. Learning is an enactment: she calls it a ‘corporeal cognitive practice’ (Haraway, 2016a: 277), a material semiotic co-composition of relational acts of thinking and doing. Learning comes about through specific, mundane, embodied acts of communication that forge partial connections across the differences (of race, class, geography or species) that divide us.

Haraway’s philosophy, and its promise for education, demonstrates the need to move beyond human exceptionalism. It is an urgent call for us to take responsibility for how humans have produced alarming natural-cultural conditions, and to take action to address these. The task of shaping better human/planetary futures has been recognised as core to education as an ethical-political project (Strand, 2020). Haraway’s philosophy offers an affirmative biopolitics that can be useful in extending curricula on global education (Barratt Hacking and Taylor, 2020). Her transdisciplinary thinking, feminist situated ethics, and situated politics of knowledge might be the basis for renewing educational approaches for composing more relational futures.

How has Haraway’s philosophy been influential in our research?

Carol has taken up Haraway’s philosophy outlined in When Species Meet (2008) to rethink what comes to matter in educational relations. Her work addresses the question: How can multispecies knowings and matterings give us hope to build a better world for the future? Haraway (2008: 134) uses multispecies thinking to argue for ‘compassionate action’ to promote well-being for individuals, species and communities. Carol has considered how such thinking can be the foundation for different forms of educative flourishing by fashioning education as a form of posthuman Bildung that bring new possibilities for knowledge/praxis (Taylor, 2016). Carol has also considered how nonhuman-human relations can centre around play and pleasure in ways which make consequential differences in our lives as academics (Taylor, 2017).

Nikki (Fairchild, 2017) has drawn on The Cyborg Manifesto (1991) to reconceptualise young children’s gender identities. Haraway uses the cyborg both as figuration and ontological position to explore the breakdown and fluidity of technological, natural and cultural bodily boundaries. Nikki’s research shows how the cyborg figuration ‘moves beyond traditional notions of the feminine body’ (Benozzo et al., 2019: 89). Her doctoral thesis considered how girls are expected to perform and act in certain ways (Fairchild, 2017) and how the cyborg can ‘produce[s] new articulations of gender at the same time as making traditional gendered societal roles ‘available’’ (Taylor & Fairchild, 2020: 520). The cyborg subverts gender and provides new political possibilities for women.

In Staying with the Trouble, Haraway posits ‘lived storying’ (2016b: 150) as ‘the most powerful practice for… becoming-with each other’. Shiva has written of co-storytelling as a way of making-together, co-theorizing and co-enduring (Niccolini, Zarabadi & Ringrose, 2018). Lived storying foregrounds the care-full response-ability required when researching participants’ experiences. Towards the end of her PhD thesis writing, the COVID pandemic put the world into multiple lockdowns and made racism intelligible in new ways. Shiva’s PhD participants are from British Bangladeshi backgrounds, they live in overcrowded households and, like other BAME populations, suffer disproportionate social and educational inequalities (Booth, 2020). Their COVID storyings speak of histories of exclusion, troubled times and uncertain futures.

‘No adventurer should leave home without a sack’ writes Haraway (2016b: 40) in Staying with the Trouble. Haraway learned about the carrier bag theory of storytelling from Ursula Le Guin (1989). During her PhD, Anna experimented with a Bag-lady positionality (Moxnes, 2019), figuring herself as an (elderly) woman collecting whatever she found carrying everything with her in bags. For Anna, the carrier bag theory became a story of research, a methodological and methodic concept, a feminist force enabling her to do research differently. Carrier bag research provides a compass ‘to think otherwise’ – it changes our understandings of the world we live in and how we make meaning about it.

In our work together, Haraway’s philosophy gives us the courage to find philosophical and practical ways of troubling dominant educational thinking, research and writing (Zarabadi et al., 2019). Haraway’s philosophy informs our collaborative research experiments in theory, method and practice enabling us to continue to think of new ways to produce academic knowledge differently.

Some Final Thoughts

Haraway’s books are not easy, but they repay the focus, immersion and concentration needed. Haraway makes you think about how you can do research and teaching differently and in more creative ways. Her writing is an encouragement to slow down, ponder, not rush to action too quickly, and to focus on details and specificities. She offers intellectual resources to contest neoliberal imperatives of competitive individualism, performativity and measurement. Haraway’s philosophy provides a stimulus to new, creative, experimental ways of producing knowledge; her generative, ecological, life-affirming thinking offers important insights for reshaping educational thinking to contest the damages of the Anthropocene.

Citations and Further Reading

Biography of Donna Haraway

Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective – Haraway, 1988

Situated Knowledges – Monika Rogowska-Stangret

Manifestly Haraway – Haraway, 2016

Rethinking Ethical-Political Education – Strand, Torill

Reconceptualizing international mindedness in and for a posthuman world – Barratt Hacking and Taylor, 2020

When Species Meet – Haraway, 2008

Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education – Taylor, 2016

Producing Pleasure in the Contemporary University – Taylor, 2017

Earthworm disturbances: the reimagining of relations in Early Childhood Education and Care – Fairchild, 2017

Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (The Cyborg Manifesto) – Haraway, 1991

Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: Post‐qualitative re‐turnings – Benozzo et al., 2019: 89

Towards a posthumanist institutional ethnography: viscous matterings and gendered bodies – Taylor and Fairchild, 2020

Staying with the Trouble – Haraway, 2016

Spinning Yarns: Affective Kinshipping as Posthuman Pedagogy – Niccolini, Zarabadi & Ringrose, 2018

BAME groups hit harder by Covid-19 than white people, UK study suggests

Dancing at the Edge of the World – Ursula Le Guin

Working Across/Within/Through Academic Conventions of Writing a Ph.D.: Stories About Writing a Feminist Thesis – Moxnes, 2019

Feeling Medusa: Tentacular Troubling of Academic Positionality, Recognition and Respectability – Zarabadi et al., 2019